Critique of International Organizations

Seventy-eight years ago, this house declared that all human

beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.

Noble words whose spirit I fully share.

To that end,

it undertook to uphold international law, defend the sovereignty of

nations, and provide a forum in which conflicts could be

resolved through cooperation rather than immediately through the

force of arms.

That was the original purpose, the contract that we all signed.

But today, regrettably, it is time to acknowledge that in practice

that sacred covenant has been broken.

That's to say it's become a useless organization whose only

purpose is to sustain a caste of fatally arrogant

parasites masquerading as well-intentioned bureaucrats.

I would remind them of what Mises said, "Good people do not

think about controlling the lives of their fellow human beings."

Those who were supposed to guarantee collective security and human rights

failed in their task.

Instead, they allowed chaos, violence, and international terrorism to flourish.

The alleged defenders of human rights have

sheltered the bloodthirsty dictatorships and regimes that stone women

in the streets. They have systematically voted against

Israel

while remaining silent in the face of Islamic terrorism and the

genocide of Christians in Africa.

And as if that were not enough, an organization established to defend the

territorial sovereignty of its members decided to look the other

way with regard to the situation of the Malvinas Islands, South Georgia Islands,

and South Sandwich Islands, and the surrounding maritime areas.