Transparency in Epstein Case Files

one, I Katie Fang, private citizen, have standing to be able to get Todd Blanche as the acting

attorney general of the Department of Justice to be able to comply with Judge Sullivan's order,

which is now telling him that on or before July 2nd, he either has to put up or shut up.

He either has to bring forth unredacted files or show cause as to why he should not or cannot do so.

But I have identified, Ben, specific areas in the Epstein files. Number one, redactions that

have been made to senders and recipients, names and email addresses for some of the most egregious,

egregious email communications with Jeffrey Epstein, talking about little girls being

naughty, things like that. Judge Sullivan says those identities have to be disclosed.

Number two, the FBI interview notes for the victim who was alleged that when she was 13 years old,

she was physically and sexually abused by Donald Trump. Judge Sullivan has said that

Todd Blanche must produce those or show cause as to why that he should not have to do so.

The foreign language documents in the Epstein Files Act that the Department of Justice didn't

bother to do interpretations or translations of. Judge Sullivan said you have to produce those.

The names in two internal DOJ documents that identify the co-conspirators slash co-defendants

that were going to be a part of that proposed indictment in the Southern District of Florida

that never materialized because it was never produced or presented to the grand jury. Instead,

Epstein got his sweetheart plea deal with the state authorities. Judge Sullivan says that those

identities of those co-conspirators and co-defendants must be revealed. And lastly,

there was the redaction log that the Epstein Files Transparency Act required the DOJ to produce

contemporaneously with the rollout of these files. It was supposed to identify the grounds

underneath this law as to why they were withholding or redacting certain bits of information.

The DOJ wiped his ass with it, Ben, and did not produce that at all. Judge Sullivan said,

you better do it and start it now. If not, there's going to be consequences. I mean,

this is a big deal, Ben. This judge says I have informational harm and economic harm,

but you know what the best part about this order is? It says that Blanche must produce, quote,

to the public, not to just Ms. Fang, but to the public. And this is why I brought this

lawsuit in the beginning. We needed this transparency as the American public,

and we had to force the DOJ to have to do this.