Analysis of Obama Administration's Intelligence Actions

Fox News alert. The Director of National Intelligence,

Tulsi Gabbard, releasing a

bombshell report today that shows a conspiracy by a sitting

president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the

president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and

undermine the legitimacy of an election.

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and

his national security team directed the creation of an

intelligence community assessment that they knew was

false. They knew it would promote this contrived

narrative that

Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump

win, selling it to the American people as

though it were true.

It wasn't.

Gabbard got her hands on a house intel report that's been locked away in a

CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent

over

2,000 hours looking into how the Russia hoax was born,

interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials, and it

turns out that the Obama administration doctored the

intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the

election.

A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't

satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA

director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the

election. This was a highly unusual move.

John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the

assessment, and they were siloed.

None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in

charge of drafting this report. There was nothing routine about

this, and it was a rush job to publish before

Trump was sworn in.

Nothing was coordinated with the other intelligence agencies either.

Basically, this was home cooking for Barack Obama.

There were four key elements from the assessment that were repeated

over and over again and form the basis of the Russia hoax

and the

Robert Mueller witch hunt. One, that Vladimir Putin wanted

Donald Trump to win. Two, Putin took action to

help Trump win. Three, the Russians had blackmail on

Trump. That was the Steele dossier.

And four, that the Russians tried colluding with the

Trump campaign.

None of any of this was ever true.

There was no reliable intelligence to support any of these

allegations. Senior CIA officials repeatedly

refused to traffic in these allegations, but they were

repeatedly overruled by CIA Director Brennan and

FBI Director Comey, who insisted that they be pushed

even without verifiable evidence.

The Obama administration cherry-picked the intelligence,

lied about their sources, misquoted sources, didn't

corroborate their claims, suppressed intelligence

that ran counter to their

narratives, and even used anonymous internet postings.

Rank and file CIA admitted what they were doing violated their own

tradecraft standards.

There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top.

CIA analysts say they received unusual directives from

political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama

himself.

This is how the Russia hoax was born.

Donald Trump knows, uh, that the Russians helped him win in

2016.

Putin hated Secretary Clinton so much that, that the flip

side of that coin was he had a clear preference for the

person running against the

person he hated so much.

It was Russia, in a very systematic way, uh, in try

to interfere in the election and to try to advance the prospects of

Donald Trump

being elected.

This was such a malicious disinformation campaign perpetrated on the American

people that at one point,

60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting machines

to help Trump win the White House.

What this report actually shows is that the Russians just wanted to

create chaos and undermine Americans' faith in

democracy. Solid intelligence suggested that Vladimir

Putin didn't care who won. He had no preference,

but like most people, expected Hillary to win and had a little

docket of compromising dirt on her, dirt that he never released.

Now, if Putin wanted Trump to win, why didn't Putin

drop the dirt?

There were high-level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's,

quote, "psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger,

aggression, and cheerfulness," and that then Secretary

Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers.

Then CIA Director Brennan and the intelligence community

mischaracterized

intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to

create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a, quote unquote,

"clear

preference for Trump."

Now, if Clinton was on tranquilizers like the

Russians believed, why didn't

they leak it to help Trump win?

How credible was the information on Hillary Clinton's health?

All I have seen is what, uh, the intelligence, uh, committee

have reported through their investigation.

Uh, I think the, the, the underlying point there is, is

that we understand from intelligence what Russia said that

they had, and the important point here is that if they were trying

to influence the election, uh, as President Obama and

James Clapper and John Brennan, everybody said they were doing in order

to support Donald Trump's election, they would have released the most

damning of that information.

Obama and his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump

over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make

it look like he

did. Obama and his intel spies knew that Putin didn't collude with

Trump, and that he didn't even direct his people

to help Trump win,

but they put it out there anyway.

In a sense, Barack Obama did exactly what

Putin wanted,

undermined Americans' faith in free and fair elections and caused chaos in

our country.

Barack Obama, the CIA, and the FBI were the ones doing

what our enemy wanted.

Do you believe that any of this new information implicates

former President Obama in criminal behavior?

We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents, uh, to the

Department of Justice and the FBI, uh, to investigate the criminal

implications of this.

For even former President Obama?

The evidence ... Correct. The evidence that we have, uh, found

and that we have released, uh, directly point to President

Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence

assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence

and intelligence that

confirm that fact.

Even two years later, after the election, Barack Obama was still

pushing a hoax he knew wasn't true, and he knew it wasn't true because he

helped manufacture it.

They're undermining our alliances,

cozying up to Russia.

What happened to the Republican Party?

They're cozying up to the former head of the KGB.

Come on.

Actively blocking legislation that, that would defend our elections from

Russian

attack. What happened?

Now, I don't know if it's possible to indict a

former president for actions he took

while in office. I'm not a lawyer, proudly.

But Brennan, Comey, and others may have severe

liability. Trey Gowdy says we know for a fact

that Brennan

committed perjury when he lied to Congress.

Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the Steele

dossier?

I don't.

Do you know if the Bureau ever relied on the Steele-