NASA Footage Manipulation Analysis

As I will prove it here again, two different NASA missions claimed

ownership of the same footage,

making them liars.

And the propagandists can't claim it's a simple mistake because both mission

astronauts commented on the video as though they witnessed the event, and

the second video was even altered slightly.

Let's first watch the STS-32 mission, which

launched on January 9th, 1990.

I pulled the video from this channel, and the timestamp is there

too in case you wanna look it up yourself.

I will fast-forward to the footage at issue.

The most difficult part about, uh, a shuttle mission is getting a whole crew

to-

- wanna see rockets that big.

You see some of the ice floating around as the external tank comes off after the,

uh,

fuel is expended. This is on orbit after, uh, eight and a half minutes.

Again, from that same camera in the belly of the

vehicle, kind of a unique view

of the external tank going down. This is the one part of the, of the

v- the whole system that is not recovered.

It breaks up in the atmosphere and, uh,

lands in the Pacific Ocean in our case.

Now, let's watch the footage from STS-78,

which was launched on June 20th, 1996, and this

is where I pulled the video from. I'll fast-forward again to the footage in

question.

Here we are suiting up at the Kennedy Space Center for our launch on June 20th.

Well, it was just absolutely fantastic to see

the, be in space and see this great

piece of American technology come off the external tank.

Uh, it was really difficult for Rick and I to focus on getting, uh, pictures of

this because here we saw the Earth and land masses and the oceans floating

beneath

us. But, uh, the external tank, uh, just did a super job.

Now let's watch the two separate videos synced.

Remember, these videos were supposedly filmed over six years

apart.

If you're really paying attention, you might notice that the two videos

are almost

identical, but not one hundred percent.

Yes, they most certainly used the same footage,

but the one on the right includes a

few more particles, and I don't think it's just the increased

brightness.

Which means they manipulated the footage further, which only proves that

this was willful deception.