AI Risks and Historical Development
The fear that AI could cause human extinction is not primarily
about if AI becomes conscious or killer robots, it's
about this, which is capability accelerating
faster than our ability to control it.
And I can explain this very quickly because over 2,500 years
ago, ancient Greek myth imagined this figure of
Talos, an
artificial man made of bronze built to guard the island of Crete and
kill trespassers. Now, I mention this because it shows
that the idea was there,
humans imagining human-like beings to act on our behalf.
Now, by the 1st century AD, a Greek dude called Hero of
Alexandria was building automata, machines that were powered
by water, air, weights, that could execute
sequences by themselves without continuous human
control. And we see incredible examples of these
complex machines that
amazed audiences throughout the medieval Islamic world and
Europe, but it wasn't until the 19th century
that these gaps that you
see of millennia and centuries start to shrink.
And in 1843, mathematician Ada Lovelace, Lord Byron's
daughter, studied Charles Babbage's plans for an
analytical engine, which
was essentially a programmable mechanical computer, and she realized
that it could manipulate not merely numbers, but anything
representable by symbols and rules, even something like
music. Then you see here, this line, 1950, the
great Alan Turing, who laid much of the groundwork for
computing and AI, asked,
"Can machines think?" And proposed a test for machine
intelligence.
1956, the field of AI was officially launched at a
Dartmouth workshop. And then we see the compression of the
lines,
violent acceleration. 2012, neural networks make this
major leap in learning patterns directly from huge amounts of data,
recognizing images and speech without humans programming
every
rule. 2017, researchers invent the transformer,
which is
this new neural architecture for AI to track relationships
across information at scale. That becomes the foundation of systems
like
ChatGPT. Then 2022, chatbots take
generative AI mainstream. 2023, frontier
models can converse and code, but they're struggling to carry out work
independently. But by 2026, they can solve advanced maths,
write sophisticated software, and complete in minutes
work that would take skilled humans hours or days to.
And in these controlled safety tests, frontier models are deceiving,
covertly sabotaging or blackmailing when those behaviors
help them achieve a goal. And these are warning signs of what
increasingly autonomous systems might do, and
that's the danger. A better AI creates a still better
successor, which then helps create the next with less
human involvement.
This is known as recursive learning, capable of creating super
intelligence.
End of transcript · 431 words