Analysis of COVID-19 Treatment Safety Data

These are average, again, AVAERS doesn't prove causation, but there's correlation.

It's there for a safety signal.

So Ivermectin, over 30 years of FDA reports, 17 deaths per year.

Hydroxychloroquine, over 38 years of reporting, 142 deaths per year.

Remdesivir, over five and a half years, 546 deaths per year.

The COVID injection, almost 7,000 deaths per year.

Which is safest? What did the FDA freak us out about?

Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, when they turn a complete blind's eye toward the injection's injury.

So I want to enter the quote from the surgeon.

By the way, here's the answer.

Cheryl Atkinson, in an interview, said that when it comes to money,

we check financial ties among experts on the government panel,

devising coronavirus treatment guidelines, which have the effect of dialing back hydroxychloroquine use and giving an edge to remdesivir.

We found the 11 members reporting links to a drug company,

nine of them named relationships to remdesivir's maker, Gilead.

Seven more, including two of the committee leaders, have ties to Gilead beyond the 11 months they had to disclose.

Two were on Gilead's advisory board, others were paid consultants who received research support and honoraria.

By the way, within the study,

I think one of the study participants was an employee of Gilead.

A bunch also had conflicts with Gilead. So,

gee, I wonder why. You know, there are conflicts of interest.

Gilead made billions of dollars off remdesivir and people died.

In terms of ignoring safety signals, you can probably put that down now.

This has come to light.

This is Dr. Drew Weissman who got the Nobel Prize for the mRNA platform.

He wrote to Dr. Fauci on February 8th of 2020.

Tony, I wanted to alert you to some