Debate on Socialism in Latin America and the US
So now, Colombia rejected a socialist, Peru rejected a
socialist, El Salvador, Chile, Honduras,
Ecuador, Bolivia, Argentina all rejected Marxist
or socialist leadership. And Venezuela was destroyed by
socialism. Latin Americans are rejecting socialism after
having tried it. So why are Americans accepting socialism, having
never tried it? Well, partially because most Americans
don't know what socialism is. It's not healthcare for all,
or affordable housing. Socialism isn't a synonym for
all the things I want, but I'm not getting in my capitalist
country.
It's not a vibe. It's an economic system
characterized by collective or governmental ownership of the
means of production. Means of production meaning infrastructure
used to
produce goods and services, like factories, farms, and companies.
Capitalism also isn't a vibe. It's not billionaires
and corporations controlling politics.
It's not a synonym for all the things I hate about my country.
It's an economic system characterized by private or corporate
ownership of capital goods, AKA the means of
production. Now, just like Mac versus Windows, there
are different
versions of capitalism and socialism.
Finland, Norway, Denmark, and Sweden are less
capitalistic than America, but they are still capitalist.
Although they have a few exceptions to the rule, private companies own the means
of production, not the government in those countries.
Now, you might like certain programs that socialism promises,
like universal healthcare, but those programs aren't tied to a
specific operating system. You can run Photoshop on Mac
or Windows, just like you can have universal
healthcare in
socialism or capitalism. But it seems we as a people
keep getting more confused about what socialism is.
In 1949, 34% of Americans correctly
identified socialism as government ownership of the economy.
By 2018, only 17% did, and I suspect it's
even worse now. American politicians are confused too.
In 2015, Denmark's prime minister had to correct
Bernie Sanders
and say, "Denmark is far from a socialist-planned
economy.
Denmark is a market economy." Zoran Mamdani is a
democratic socialist. Democratic socialism is a version
of socialism. Now, you could argue that socialism just hasn't
been done right yet. And when every socialist
experiment at the national level in the 20th century failed,
and every experiment in the 21st century is failing, maybe
the problem isn't that socialism hasn't worked in practice,
it, that it almost certainly can't work in
principle.
And maybe the assertion that this time will be different isn't
optimism, it's actually just unfalsifiability,
where a theory cannot ever be contradicted by
actual evidence. We have bugs in this version of capitalism
that need to be fixed, principally that there's too much money
in politics, that billions of dollars speak louder than
millions of voices. And you know what?
The socialists might create healthy pressure to fix those
bugs. That's good. But that's different than changing the
whole
operating system. Sometimes the cure is worse than the
disease, because when there's never been a successful
socialist country in
history, and the countries who have actually
experimented with it are
abandoning it, the results start to speak for themselves.
And lately,
they're speaking Spanish.
If this made you feel calmer and clearer, and you want to practice talking about
topics like this without losing loved ones, join us at
Clear Thinker Academy.
Link in bio.
End of transcript · 548 words