Judges’ Oaths, the Tribunal and the President’s Role

It's high time to restore the rule of law and for lawful judges to be able to rule.

We saw various kinds of maneuvers by the President's Office.

First, attempts to question the election of these judges in the Sejm, the validity of their election.

That was disproved when footage was shown of how the election of these judges proceeded.

Later, we heard from the head of the Office that the president examines judges' CVs.

This is unlawful, an unacceptable violation of the law.

The point was to prevent these judges from working.

So at the moment when one wants to rebuild, we hear about a coup d'état. This is a typical example of what we call "Catch the thief." Someone who steals in a crowd suddenly shouts, "Catch the thief!" to distract the others.

That's how I see it today. The rule of law is being restored. The Tribunal is being rebuilt.

We have an opinion from the Venice Commission, which clearly stated that if the president fails to fulfill his constitutional duties, the judges may carry out, in place of the president, a kind of substitute swearing-in. And all these judges did so,

so they are acting in accordance with