COVID Response and Natural Immunity Debate

We all have what we consider to be the most shocking, uh, feature of,

of the COVID response. But, uh, for me, I still can't get over the

fact that I, I was told by

top FDA, NIH officials

that a major reason for social distancing, lockdowns,

masking, plexiglass, stay-at-home orders, and everything else

was to delay, um, the onset of natural immunity,

to delay, uh, rise in seroprevalence levels, to

delay endemicity, uh, until after the shots were

online. So, uh, so it wasn't just that,

um, all these tactics, these, these sort of social engineering

tactics were designed to, you know, keep us well.

Uh, no, it was ex-exactly the opposite.

It was, it was to keep us from, from gaining, uh,

a natural capacity to resist, uh, the virus, so, so

that they could wait until the injection came along, so the injection

could, could, could be deployed and experimented upon us

and, and thereby get, be, you know, be- get all the credit for

having, for having solved the issue. And I-- That is...

'cause that sounds like a wild conspiracy theory, but, uh, that's what

they meant by flatten the curve. Flatten the curve meant

de-de-delay the, you know, prolong the pain, uh, delay

the solution. Um,

and, and it sounds, sounds crazy until you hear it

from people who were there on the ground in the

agencies, in the companies, uh, watching all this

unfold. And multiple sources have, have confirmed this

without a shadow of doubt in their mind that, that, that, the, that was the

real purpose of, of the school closures, the business shutdowns, the,

uh, stay-at-home orders, the travel restrictions and everything, to

delay, uh, the, the, the point at which we would, um,

have, have solved, essentially solved the problem through,

mm, uh, through natural exposure and immune upgrades.