Discussion on Vaccine Controversy and Genocide Claims

It's not true.

Don't believe them. If John Ioannidis of Stanford says this,

you can damn well be sure

that there's something behind it.

Do you think this is, uh, Michael Yeadon says that this is a,

a genocide,

that this is criminal. And you've said the same thing, this

is criminal. Explain.

It's genocide, it's criminal. Explain.

I

am afraid to say

up until one and a half years ago,

I would never undersign this.

But now that I see what is going on,

I have to admit that those colleagues and friends of

mine

who have been telling me that this is genocide may be

right.

They may be right. I don't know,

but

I feel in my mind that there can be no

other agenda.

There is no other explanation. There is no other

explanation.

Because it is clear

that these vaccines, the gene-based vaccines,

first of all,

uh, are not needed

because we're not dealing with a killer virus

that is

destroying mankind.

Anyone who says otherwise is obviously lying

to your face.

Second,

it is obvious

that these so-called vaccines

could never, ever have protected against

infection

because the antibodies are not there where they are needed,

first.

Second, because

the

resistance

and the immunity to these viruses is not

antibody-based. It is based on T

cells that are present in every human

being.

And third,

and the worst,

is that these gene-based vaccines

are the most terrible

instruments that have ever been

introduced

into the human body

to destroy humans,

starting from the mind,

going to the heart,

going to the organs, and to the entire body.

And these vaccines are going to

destroy mankind.