Media Misrepresentation of Ivermectin

Okay, so how did Anthony Fauci use his media platform to mislead you, your family, and basically the whole world?

Well, he did it by using the media to omit critical life-saving information.

Let's start with this. The same thing you say, there's no evidence.

There was all kinds of evidence.

You had a interview on CNN on August 29th of 2021,

where again, I just don't wanna take time to find the exact quote, said, there's no evidence.

There's no evidence that ivermectin is helpful. On that exact same day, and I've got the studies right here.

There was a website that was tracking the random controlled studies.

Here they are, showing 60, 70% efficacy of ivermectin.

The same thing you say, there's no evidence. There's all kinds of evidence.

And you weren't told that by the media, were you? That data, it was there the whole time.

And those of us who knew it, who were studying it, they wouldn't let us report it.

In fact, here's how it happened.

I was angry at newscasts that very same month, and we had a story on ivermectin.

When I read through the script of the story on the set,

there was critical information that was missing.

There was no mention that ivermectin studies showed a 67% effectiveness.

There was no mention that doctors were prescribing it more and more because it was working.

There was no mention that ivermectin was causing the COVID rates to drastically drop in other countries.

And there was no mention that ivermectin got the Nobel Prize for Medicine because of its safety. And it got that award in 2015.

I added all of those points to the script to make sure the story was balanced and it had actual facts with the other side.

What was there was only a doctor who said he wouldn't use ivermectin on his patients.

And there was a lady who was standing next to a horse saying that ivermectin was used on her horses and she would never use it on people.

Again, no mention of the studies you just saw or the fact that people were actually suing hospitals at that point,

forcing the hospitals to use ivermectin to save their loved ones because hospitals were refusing to use it.

After I added the facts and the balance of that story, I got the surprise of my career.

I'm telling you, this has never happened to me in my career.

My news director came into the studio at that point and he asked,

why did you change the script?

I told him, I changed it because it was not balanced and there were facts that were missing in the story. It was misleading.

It's been changed, he said, and you will read what's in the prompter.

He looked at me and he pointed his finger. He said, you will read what's in the prompter.

Bursting out of my mouth, no, I will not.

He said, you will read what's in the prompter. I said, no, I will not.

I said, someone else can read the story, but it is not going to be me because if I read that story, I'd be responsible for omitting information.

And that was one of many battles that I had in that newsroom.

And guess what? Sadly, someone else did read that story that day three times.

So here's the question.

Why didn't they want you to know about ivermectin? Let's break it down.

The shot was released, if you'll remember, on an emergency authorization order.

In order to do that,

there cannot be any other drug on the market that would be effective against COVID.

Ivermectin was effective against COVID.

And now we all know that Fauci actually doubled his wealth during COVID, and the drug companies,

they made big dollars. on forcing people to take a shot that we also now know is still killing people.

And it was also on that day that I knew I wouldn't be there for much longer because I was not going to allow the gifts and the talents that God gave me to be used to mislead people because I am accountable to one God.

It took a

while for me to realize that I was not going to be there for much longer because I was not going to allow the gifts and the talents that God gave me to be used to mislead people because I am accountable to one God.