Discussion on Historical Exploitation and Race

So things get really deep when you look into the tiny hats

and slavery. Yes, this was left out of the history books because guess who owns

the history books? Those tiny hats over here.

And when we look at

who owned all the slaves and were the slave traders and the auctioneers?

Tiny hats. And who owned the newspapers?

Tiny hats. And then who also created the division?

Oh, I think you're starting to understand it.

And then you also find about the exploitation of the slaves

and how they treated people. Obviously, they're not going to tell anybody

this part. And then it also gets interesting when you find out that

the tiny hats were defending that they should stay slaves. Isn't that interesting?

And people would say, no, that would never happen, really. Slave dealing was an

extremely profitable business.

And this is where it always ties back to the Rothschilds.

Like I've always talked about.

Even Malcolm X talked about this. People should look into this.

A Negro is not anti Semitic when he

says that the man who's exploiting him in his community is white.

Because it is a white man who owns all the stores.

Now, is it an accident that these whites who own these stores are Jewish?

If it's an accident, then the fact that he says the

Jew on the corner is exploiting me isn't an anti Semitic statement.

It's just more descriptive of the man who's exploiting him.