Interview on Vaccine Safety Concerns

When I first spoke, uh, well, when I, when, when I

did a major interview in twenty twenty-one,

I was at that point sure that there wasn't a pandemic, or at least

whatever was happening had been deliberately and through planning

exaggerated to frighten people. And I focus very much

because of my history

as a research executive in pharma for over thirty years.

Um, I was very concerned about the injections

because

I knew there wasn't a public health threat,

so why would you want to be injected?

Uh, my thinking has advanced quite a lot since

then, which

I may talk about later in this interview.

But it's, it's not possible for the injections to be

of help

to anybody. It's literally not possible.

Every medicine, every molecule and atom, and constituent

of every medicine is in there because somebody chose to put it in there.

Hopefully for good reasons, but they put it in there for a purpose, to

stabilize something or make it big enough to swallow in the,

in the form

of a tablet. If you just have the active ingredients,

in some drugs it's

too small to see, so you need to, to formulate it with what are called

excipients.

So, but when I spoke before,

I, I could see multiple features in the

so-called vaccines that were, was not necessary, even if

I believed the lies that, about what I was being told about these things.

Even if you believed them, it would not be necessary to incorporate

certain features, uh, about them.

And so my bottom line is I think, and I'm well qualified to make

this claim, probably better qualified than any other

single

person speaking out, they have been designed intentionally to

injure, kill, and reduce fertility.

I've never claimed it would do it to a lot of people or that it would be quick.

In fact,

specifically, I remember saying at the time,

I don't think they want

to risk injuring and killing too many people early on

because we'll-- people will spot it.

What I expected once I started looking around and noticing other things,

like there was a talk of electronic money getting rid of cash,

uh, and there was talk of digital ID.

I remember Tony Blair trying to do that in the nineties.

And frankly, I joined the dots, and I could see

a world in which you were required to have digital ID, that

cash was removed, so you had to spend only using digital

money.

And I thought, you know what? If I was the evil person, I would say

that your digital ID will not be valid unless you're up to date with your

injections. And, and I came across a

document from the EU. It's called EU

VABECO, V-A-B-E-C-O,

and it's a scheme that started in twenty eighteen.

Bottom line is it, the EU Commission

anticipates a future in which every EU citizen has a digital

ID whose validity is governed by whether or not

they've been injected with the latest mRNA-based,

quote, vaccine. So they anticipate

regular injection

for the rest of your life.

That's, you know, if you... And the, and the idea is it'll improve health and

safety as you travel around, which is a lie.

It's a lie. Um, you being vaccinated doesn't protect

anybody. In fact, I would recommend no one has any vaccine

at all

from what I've discovered in the last year or so.

Um, but, you know, honestly, when have governments ever given a

flying one about your health and safety?

You must know that a claim that you must do something for

your health and safety is, uh, what it, what it's called, it's an

excuse. It's an ostensible reason.

Uh, these people who are trying to take our lives away from us

always use, um, two things. It's always two things.

They'll tell you about something using the, uh, the

excuse, the ostensible reason.

Um, so in this case it'll be you have to be

jabbed to protect you from

marauding viruses. The real reason is they, I'm afraid they want to

make you ill and kill you.

That is the truth.