Debate on Israel-Palestine Legal Claims

Israel has valid, long-standing historical ties to the land.

No. Legally, no. It doesn't have any legal foundation.

In the League of Nations covenant that was part of the Versailles Treaty,

the Palestine Mandate was supposed to be provisionally

recognized as an

independent state, a state for everyone, a single state

for all the people on that land, not a state for a particular

racial group.

What is or would be Israel's strongest argument before a court of

law?

For what?

To dominate Palestinians?