Claims About PCR Testing and COVID-19 Case Definitions

February 2020, another thing started, and that was that there was a test, a PCR test, that was invented by Mr. Drosten, and it was accepted by WHO, and the WHO said, "Yes, when the test is positive, we have a case of COVID-19."

So the meaning of the word case has been changed during the data collection of an epidemic.

That is, from, for an epidemiologist and for everybody else, the worst thing that can happen.

Because I realized very quickly that it was used to define cases.

Cases, for us, in our language, is about patients and, and here the cases became the p- the positivity to PCR. So it... Forget about the individual. It was just a result from a technique.

They're now calling apples oranges, and now there are many oranges, many more than there were before.

Before they called apples oranges. Even the WHO agrees that, uh, that it's not enough for a PCR test, for you to test positive on a PCR test, but you need symptoms, and it's never in the history of mankind, in the, in the history of medicine,

there has never been testing of healthy people.

You should not be using this test on people without symptoms.

Mass testing of people without symptoms has, has no underpinning science at all. Um, and, uh, you know, it's, it's just a way of frightening people.

It creates the impression that something bad is happening because there are so many cases. No, there are not so many cases.

We have finally built this crisis with this new definition of cases based on this PCR testing.

And this is how they started counting the cases.

What they counted was the activity of testing, and the more they tested, the more cases they found.

$100 billion, uh, to r- roll out a nationwide testing.

For starters, we're at about one million tests per week.

How do you get to the point where there were-