FDA Safety Signals and Data Analysis
Here's the sheet.
These are the adverse events that they were showing a safety
signal for using the new method. Bell's palsy,
sinus rhythm,
cardiac failure, chronic, acute left ventricular
failure,
agonal rhythm, which is severe arrhythmia generally occurred
at the end of life, pulmonary infarction,
cerebral artery occlusion, aortic
stenosis, sudden cardiac death,
hypertensive emergency,
basal ganglia stroke.
Now, these aren't minor. Remember, we're always told, you know,
adverse events are rare and minor.
These are not minor
adverse events. And these safety signals were showing
and they were
strong, but they were being hidden because FDA officials
refused to acknowledge that the current system they were using
was invalidated.
And they had to look at the new system that unmasked these things.
Our report goes on to detail how federal officials refused to acknowledge these
revelations or take action to warn the public.
Instead, senior FDA officials repeatedly
tried to stop Dr. Sharfman from continuing her work or
communicating her findings outside of FDA.
In September 2021, Dr. Marks
informed Dr. Patricia Cavazzoni, the then director of
CDER, that Dr. Sharfman, who was a CDER employee,
quote, has been asked to cease and desist conducting
her data analysis. Dr. Marks complained that Dr.
Sharfman's work had become, quote, a major distraction,
that her efforts could create erroneous conflicts that feed
to anti-vaccination rhetoric.
End of transcript · 226 words