Epstein's Role in Global Power Dynamics
I basically wrote, um, a very large book that got divided into
two books by my publisher about Epstein and the
intelligence connections. And so basically what I argue about
is that there's
this transnational group, um, that Epstein was
part of, but he wasn't the head of it.
He's like middle management in it, at best.
Um, and that these people, um, exert influences over
many governments and, um,
they are not really, um,
uh, overseen by any national government, nor really loyal
to any of them. Um, and that they're, uh, basically
the, the one of the, you know, uh, de facto ways, uh,
our world is actually governed as opposed to the public governments, uh, that we
all know, which are, have basically been reduced to enabling
environments
for the policies made by these other people that are then filtered down through
think tanks or philanthropic foundations.
Think the Gates Foundation, for example.
And so like if you look at Epstein in a, in, you know, as, as a
microcosm of this, like he was setting up a lot of these
philanthropic
foundations that influence policy.
He was doing a lot of shady financial stuff, helping powerful people hide their
taxes so they don't have to pay it. He was money laundering.
Um, and so a lot of these things, uh, don't get prosecuted when they're
done by very powerful people in the United States.
Um, and it's interesting too that one of the funds that Epstein
was involved
setting up was actually f- uh, handling money for our current Treasury
Secretary, Scott Bessent. Uh, and he refuses to
release Epstein's Treasury records even though Congressman Ron Widen,
uh, asked that they do so, and he introduced the Release Epstein
Treasury Records Act to Congress.
Haven't heard very much about that lately, but I really hope it passes 'cause
people deserve to see what was going on there,
but I have a feeling it won't.
Um, and so, um-
So the, the-
You know, these, these financial, these oligarchs that people like
Epstein front for are not accustomed to ever being, uh,
held accountable for anything. So Wexner is a good example of that,
but I don't think it's exclusive, uh, to him.
And so, um, a, a key actor in this network, uh,
testified to Congress in the early '70s, uh, about what was
going on with this group, and I think he really gave it away,
but like just
they didn't care. Um, it's really brazen, frankly.
Um, it's Samuel Pesar. He was a lawyer.
He's best known now as Anthony Blinken's stepfather.
Uh, but he was Robert Maxwell's, uh, lawyer and very close
friend and involved with, um, basically
what he said was, was building up, uh, commerce relations
between the Eastern Bloc and the Western Bloc during the Cold
War. And basically what he argued in the early
'70s to Congress
is that what was happening was the creation of a trans-ideological
corporation that was becoming the de facto, uh,
power in the world, making the nation-state irrelevant.
So what he meant by trans-ideological corporation is that
it was capitalist Western multinational
corporations entering into joint venture with communist
state-owned corporations, and that these two, the- these
forces were essentially joining hands and creating a, a, a
structure of governance that was really running the world, of economic
governance. So you see it back then in the early '70s
being
told to Congress, "We're making a sovereign corporation, a
SovCorp that runs everything. Um, and it doesn't matter what
national governments do. National governments bow to us." Um,
and so I, I would argue that that's what Epstein
was really working
for, and I think if you look at, uh, intelligence
agencies, let's take the CI- CIA, for example, uh, they serve those
same masters. The CIA is not the top of the food chain.
Um,
so, uh, for example, if you look at the early coups of the CIA,
who were they
for?
Well, in Iran in 1954, it was for Anglo American Oil.
Uh, in, in Guatemala it was for United Fruit Company.
Uh, you know, the list goes on and on of all the US corporations or
multi- multinational corporations, um, that led our
intelligence services to, you know, finance and foment,
uh, you know, coup d'etats in foreign countries.
And-
The C- the CIA is basically economic hitmen.
Would you, would that be-
Well, they, I think they have many purposes beyond
that, but that's
absolutely one of them. And they also do regime change operations-
Yes
... um, and a litany of other bad things.
So, um-
But the regi- regime changes are almost always at the,
uh, uh-
The behest of corporations. Exactly
... at the corporations. Yes.
Ex- exactly.
Yeah.
Yeah. Because what we're really talking about
is, is, are the oligarchs.
They're the ones really in charge.
Um, and, you know, uh, intelligence agencies work for them.
End of transcript · 834 words