Debate on Gender Identity and Medicalization
Gender ideology, as defined as the belief system
that we are
all assigned a sex at birth and need to go
through a journey of our own to find a gender identity that is
separate from that sex, is the very
ideological belief system that is reinforcing the
stereotypes its most fervent ideologues claim
to be dissolving.
For example, a man who dresses a little bit more
femininely, you know, he's wearing makeup, he puts on nail polish,
a dress, maybe his wrist a little bit more limp, he
is breaking the common understanding of what it means to be a man.
And anybody with half a brain or any sense of decency would say to
themselves, "Go be you. God bless." The common
understandings of what it means to be a man and a woman are often
wrong, cruel, suppressive of a very creative
spirit in us all that leads to the people the likes of
which this
world so desperately needs.
And then that man calls himself a woman,
and he is the one reinforcing those very
negative stereotypes, as if being a woman is
a feeling, a feeling of being feminine that
can be distilled into something that anybody
can achieve. As if being a man
is just a feeling that anybody can achieve when
distilled.
This is dangerously wrong. And let me read you a quote
from a woman named Kara Dansky,
former lawyer for the ACLU,
derived as the pejorative word TERF,
someone who we are told we shouldn't listen to, who says very
presciently, quote, "Women have had to fight for our rights
for
thousands of years, all over the world, and for hundreds
of years in this country, because we have been discriminated against
and excluded from public civil
society, from the educational arena, from the legal
arena, from numerous arenas on the
basis of sex.
And many of us who support these movements are not about to turn around and
pretend that sex is not a meaningful
legal and physical category." And I'm
not either, Kara. Because as soon as we say
that being a man is no more than a feeling that anybody can achieve, as soon as we
say that being a woman is no more than a feeling that anybody
can achieve, those strict legal
definitions, the basis of which
these sex-based rights that are
the protections from horrific discrimination the world has
seen,
don't mean anything.
They are dissolved. Because the law is
only as good as its definitions. And if definitions mean no
more than what we feel, then they don't mean
anything. Language doesn't mean anything.
And the law no longer means anything.
My other
gripe beyond sex-based spaces that
has caused
the teeny bits of controversy that I have experienced over the course of
my last four years in the statehouse
has been standing up against the belief that we are all born in
the wrong body and need to medicalize ourselves
in order to achieve who we truly are.
Children being told this
is most importantly the issue.
Because when you listen to people like John Skinner, Claire
Abernathy, Prishma Mosley, and the many others who are labeled as
detransitioners,
but are really just young people who have had their
bodies destroyed, their endocrine systems
damaged, their sexual function left
destroyed. I mean,
let me collect myself before I get too upset or graphic.
These people make you realize
what are we supporting?
And when in the legislature looking at the legislation
and having to make a strict up or down decision on the issue,
one that I never had to make. Before it was just, yeah, let people
be people. What does it actually truly matter?
And then you have to make the decision.
And if you're making a good decision, you listen to all.
And that includes these people who we've been told, don't listen to them.
They're nothing more than hateful conservatives.
They're nothing more than actors. They're nothing more than liars.
If that is what you truly believe after having heard the testimony of John Skinner
and Claire Abernathy and Prishma and so many others,
then I question your sense of reality.
I could not allow myself hearing
these brave testimonies of these people who could so
easily have found themselves hidden in their shell of
regret, of pain, of horror that is on
their body. Instead saying, no, I'm going to go out
and brave my entire soul to the world to make sure that no one
else gets to the point that I'm at right now.
And say to them, oh, not going to listen to you.
No, I'm listening. Don't worry. I'm listening.
If nobody else is, I am. And so many others truly
actually are. They're just afraid to stand up because of
the fervent nature of those who have continued to shut this
conversation down as no more than a distraction.
Does it sound distracting to you to keep kids out of a life of being a
patient? Does it sound distracting to you to tell
people
that you are reinforcing the sex-based
stereotypes that you claim to be dissolving by saying that people need to
achieve these stereotypes through medical interventions?
No, that's not a distraction. That's one of many
policy conversations in a legislature that needs to walk, chew
gum, pat its head, rub its tummy all at the same time.
Got it?
Folks,
anybody who tells you you are born in the wrong
body and you need to medicalize yourself with drugs and
surgery that are going to put you on a life of being a patient is a
charlatan who is lying to you.
You are born in the right body. Everybody
has their right body and nobody needs
drugs, surgery, and other lies and fantasies in
order to achieve who they truly are as a human being in this
society. And I yearn for a world where that
is the liberal movement that stands up for the health,
well-being, and truth of this society.
And that is what I'm fighting for if I return to the legislature.
And I make no qualms or apologies for standing up with the
brave
souls and women and men who have fought for and are
continuing to fight for the sex-based spaces and rights in
our world and against those who would tell
children to medicalize themselves in order to achieve who they truly are.
Because who you truly are is now.
End of transcript · 1,093 words