Critique of COVID Hospital Incentives
And what we did initially was a disaster.
Frankly, from a legislative perspective, what we did was we
actually incentivized murdering patients in hospitals.
What we did was we said, "If you go to the hospital
and you get a COVID, a positive
COVID test,
uh, then you, the hospital gets more money.
If you get, uh, put on remdesivir, the hospital gets more money.
If you get put on a vent, the hospital gets more money.
If you die, the hospital gets more money." So
incentive- incentivizing
treating a patient to get better, instead of saying,
"You get more money when this
patient's healthy,"
we said, "You get more patient when they...
uh, more money when they die." What incentive
for a hospital system
is there to, to do anything different from that
when the protocol's there?
The medical boards and all of these groups,
they're... Listen, frankly, it would take me three days to go through
all the,
the evidence that I have on corruption throughout the country on all of these
guys. We've dealt with protecting doctors from,
from just
nonsensicals, nonsensical attacks on their license
around the
country by medical boards whose board members
were practicing doctors and nurses who made tons of money
off of the existing COVID protocols, when people like Dr.
Bartlett had protocols that worked much better.
The medical boards have to be reined in a little bit because what
they did demonstrated that their interest
was more in money than it
was in protecting the lives of patients, in my opinion
End of transcript · 260 words