Concerns Over Vaccine Safety and Treatments

You had said earlier nefarious,

you felt like this was more nefarious than Dr. Burkholder.

In what sense are you saying that?

The SV40 sequences, they should not be there.

They don't need to be there to grow this in

bacteria. I don't think it's an accident.

They could have chosen another plasmid that did not have the SV40 sequences.

If these sequences sit above an oncogene and they're promiscuous,

that means they are likely to integrate in places

more likely than other genetic inserts. Thank you so much.

Then they can cause cancer.

Insertional mutagenesis anyway causes cancer.

And that's the risk.

That's why gene therapies were not brought to market for so

many years because there was a risk of causing cancer from insertional mutagenesis.

We never needed these vaccines.

We had treatments that

worked. One of our doctors here is going to tell you about that.

Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, I can tell you as a toxicologist,

they are not toxic. They are some of the safest drugs you can use.

There's no reason once the FDA found out about this contamination,

okay, and we looked to see endotoxin levels,

but they've got them all redacted.

Why would you redact them if you were trying to be transparent?

Why would you hold the data for 75 years, all of the clinical data,

for 75 years from these if you were trying to be transparent? Tell me why.

There is something very unusual going on

here that is being done differently than it's ever been done before.

We don't give experimental products to pregnant women.

We don't give experimental products to babies that have a death profile like this.

It's not done. It's never been done before.

Please protect your citizens.

Please, I am begging you to protect your citizens.

We've got to get

one state to stand up and do the right thing.

Do whatever you can so that other states will follow.

I'm sorry. Thank you, Dr. Lindsey. Any questions?