The Fiscal Impact of MENAPT Migration in Denmark and Europe
1 min Politics
1 min Politics
The economy needs migration, otherwise we can't afford our prosperity anymore.
That's probably one of the most brazen lies ever told, because exactly the migration we're talking about is ruining the state rather than keeping the economy running.
This is your daily dose of research. We're talking about migration from the MENAPT countries, the Middle East, North Africa, Pakistan, and Turkey.
Denmark's Ministry of Finance counted every tax and every public expense for every resident by origin and age.
For people from these countries, the balance is below zero at every age of life.
On average, each immigrant from these countries costs the state about nine thousand nine hundred euros a year.
Western immigrants pay in about seven thousand more than they cost.
And this is not just about welfare. It's roads, schools, hospitals, access to everything.
Welfare systems differ slightly, but infrastructure, education, and healthcare are fairly similar, so the costs probably are, too.
Here are the numbers for other major countries and the EU.
Germany, thirty-five billion euros a year.
France, twenty-eight billion. England and Wales, fifteen billion.
The EU, at least one hundred and twenty billion euros a year.
Add to that the higher crime. In Germany, citizens of these countries are crime suspects almost four times as often as Germans.
And the pensions from part two. Apply these more realistic costs to that scenario, and instead of pension money, you get about five trillion euros in extra costs by 2050 and forty-six trillion by 2100.
So put the points together, higher crime, they don't pay the pensions, and they're a net minus for the state at every stage of life.
Sounds like a really good deal to take them all in, doesn't it?
End of transcript · 290 words
TranslateMom transcribes and translates videos from X, TikTok, YouTube and Instagram. Paste a link and you get a page like this one, in your language.