Critique of BBC Bitesize Education

I can't believe this. BBC Bitesize, a children's

educational platform, is pushing far-left narratives on

and to your children, essentially brainwashing them.

Here is the evidence. I played the game earlier.

Let's have a look at it, shall we?

Um, we've got a little... Oh, it's a little Lord Herman there.

He wants amnesty for illegal migrants.

Let's give him what he wants, shall we?

Oh, you can see that there you get a plus one

on the economy and a plus one

on public health. Good. That's right.

If you give amnesty to illegal migrants, very good.

Now, let's go and do the opposite of that on BBC Bitesize.

If we deport them, what does it say?

Let's click on that little Deport button there.

Oh, this can be potentially dangerous.

Don't expect it to go unchallenged.

Minus one economy, minus one public health.

What's the message there? Illegal migration is good for us.

Your kids are learning this. Next is we've got a little Angela Rayner.

That's right. This is about housing.

She wants us to set aside housing for illegal mi...

for, well, just for migrants, actually. There you go.

Immigrants deserve good quality housing, don't they?

Let's do what Angela Rayner wants, and we get a plus one on public

health. That's right. Now, let's say no to that. What happens?

That's not necessary. We'll leave it up to the landlords.

Minus two on public health. How dare

immigrants compete equally with British people for housing?

Let's get to the next one, foreign students.

Should we train our kids or open the doors? What do you think?

Well, if we do that, it's a very good sign.

Universities are open to all. That's a plus two on the

economy, plus one on public health when we let in foreign

students. What happens if we say no?

Oh, what's that? Let's get onto the no. Keep the numbers the same.

Oh, that's a minus one for the economy.

We'll have to expand gradually, everybody. Can't prioritize our students. Next.

Should taxpayers fund degrees? What do you think about that?

Oh, it does mean higher taxes, but society will benefit.

Plus two economy, plus two public health. Now, let's do the opposite, shall we?

Should we make students pay? What happens then?

Oh, minus one economy, minus one public

health. And I think we're gonna get Lord Herman

back here. Here he is.

He wants us to sign freedom of movement

agenda here. People will benefit.

They're gonna benefit from freedom of movement.

Apparently, that's a plus three for the economy,

and it's good for the

public health, not so much for the environment, it seems.

But let's go back and do the opposite of what mini Lord

Herman wants us to do this

time. We're not gonna sign it. That's a minus two on the economy.

Freedom of movement destroys the economy. That's the message there, clearly.

Who'd have thought that importing more low-paid workers would

be bad for Britain?

This wasn't even the extent of what I found in

this one game. This brainwashing, to me, is as clear as day.

Almost every right-wing conservative answer has negative

results. You're even reprimanded by the game

when you go against its

indoctrination. Is it any surprise that now we know that

government civil servants were embedded into BBC News and

BBC Verify, by the way, where they would write articles and

fact-check stories without being transparent of the fact it wasn't the

BBC or their journalists doing so?

Well, of course, since then, The Telegraph unveiled this scandal last

night.

The BBC has been enforced into yet another humiliating U-turn and

pulled the so-called secondment for civil servants altogether.

Frankly, at this point in time, I think the BBC

needs to be gutted.