Investigation into Candace Owens' Past
Candace claiming the video isn't her.
Candace reading notice the woman says common census instead of consensus.
Case closed.
Wow,
that's crazy. We're verifying her identity because she
said something wrong in the YouTube video. That's so good, dude.
It's real. Dude, you know what's funny about that?
You know what's actually hilarious?
So think about this. This is, to me, this is the best part.
So Candace Owens is leading this investigation
for over a year. She's got the biggest, hottest
show on YouTube, on Spotify. Millions of listeners.
She's deputized her listeners to help her.
You've got people in law enforcement, high-level sources, sending her emails,
sending her tips, sending her surveillance footage,
sending her screenshots and
text messages. She's been running this investigation
for over a year with virtually limitless resources at
her disposal. Deputizing an army of
thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands, to assist her in the most
high-profile assassination of the 21st century.
And some random anonymous Twitter account, who has not
posted one thing in three years, has put that entire
thing to shame with, like, the most robust,
rigorous, fact-checked, sophisticated investigation
of her lesbian past I've ever seen in my entire life.
The Candace Owens investigation of Charlie Kirk's murder with the involvement
of tens of thousands, she's been paid hundreds of thousands,
hundreds of thousands
to debate this.
W-what's even the, what's even the argument?
It's like we don't know know, but we know.
The vibes aren't vibing. Something's off.
You trust the government narrative?
So maybe it was an exploding microphone, maybe it was a directed energy weapon.
It's like a year in and this is what they got.
Okay, show your work to the class and it's like, "So it's
shaped like a menorah. That means he was a ritualistic sacrifice and we think
they ate him."
And then it's like, okay, very good.
Uh, okay, Eco Shaggy, anonymous Twitter guy,
we don't really know anything about him. Let's see, what do you have for the class?
So we went to this data leak and we found her username.
It contains her birthday and her first, middle, and last name.
We then cross-referenced that with an old YouTube channel where
there's a video of
her and her face. Then we took that and we used it to find her Adult Friend
Finder account which has a username that's identical. And then we did this.
She went to Rhode Island and used her school email and,
and then we archived all of it. And then we...
And they're scrubbing it right now, we archived all of it.
And it's like, okay, so how is it that, like, some random guy did this in
secret by himself with no resources, and it's about whether or not she's
a lesbian, and it is the most meticulous, well-researched...
This is like, it's like a lawyer. It's like
My Cousin Vinny.
This is like a serious, it's like A Few Good Men.
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, as you'll see in Exhibit A, we
archived the Adult Friend Finder username.
It contains her birthday and her first, middle, and last name."
And then you got Candace Owens with millions of fans.
We don't know know, but we know. You know, the vibes aren't vibing, am I
right? Erika's such a bitch. Look at these text messages.
So I wrote in my diary, "Dear diary, Kanye reminds me of
Charlie."
And it just goes to show who would win.
Who would win, the most powerful female influencer on
planet Earth
or one autistic loner with the fucking internet?
I rest my case.
Who would win, the most powerful female influencer in
the world with billionaire backers like John Mappin, the
whole church of Scientology behind her,
and the government of Russia, you know, all these other things.
Who would win, that or literally one autistic loner
on a mission, on a mish?
So I thought that was funny. I just think that's ki- that is funny.
Objectively, that's funny.
And I'm stealing that take a little bit from JF.
Let's give the credit where it's due. We can all eat. Plenty to go around.
JF had this take. He said, "What does it say
that Eco Shaggy's investigation was far more rigorous
and meticulous and sophisticated than Candace Owens?
What do we do with that information? Where do we go from here?
You tell me." But anyway, so I thought that was so funny.
It's like, 'cause I-- it gets 50 million impressions.
You've got multiple people auditing the investigation and they're like, "Yep,
checks out. We did everything. It's all legit."
And it's like, who cares? Honestly, you know what my take
is about Candace Owens
and the whole thing? I don't wanna-- I'm not gonna go into the dirty stuff or
whatever. I will say though, I don't even really care
because it's like she's got a family, okay?
She kinda did what you're supposed to do, right?
What I care about is the other stuff. She got money from Oracle.
Her husband is talking about Israel.
I could really not care less if she's a lesbian. We all kinda...
You know, she's very butch and everything.
It's like, who cares? I don't, I don't really care whether it's true
or false.
If it's true, she did what she's supposed to do.
She didn't tell anybody, she got married and had a family.
It's what you're supposed to do.
The real problem is the other stuff in the investigation, which is that she
did three or four ad reads for Oracle, which is Larry Ellison,
and that her husband is on Twitter saying that he's
Israel's closest ally. You know, that's the issue actually.
It's John Mappin, it's, uh, the Kazakh wife.
It's their connections to the Mercers and Russia. That's the fucking problem.
So someone needs to look into that. That's the next investigation.
Anyway, I-
End of transcript · 1,001 words