Concerns Over Vaccine Safety and DNA

This is a good thing because we can now use these immortalized cell lines to

make vaccines in these big vats that where traces

of them, these immortalized cells, can end up in your final vaccine

product. This is from Dr. Theresa Deisher's team, uh,

from probably a decade ago now. They looked at MMR,

hepatitis A, and varicella vaccines that are produced on human fetal

cell lines like WI-38 or MRC5, and discovered that

the fetal cell DNA levels in vaccines ranged anywhere from a

hundred and forty-two nanograms to a top figure of two

thousand nanograms per dose, not ten thousand nanograms

or less. And she was actually looking at the

potential of that to

integrate into a child's, um, genetic, uh,

you know, cells, this, the genes in the cells, and potentially be

contributing to autism. But now we have a more updated look at

this. And Kevin McKernan, Speicher, and Rose have

shown numerous times just how bad the situation

really is regarding residual plasmid DNA and residual SV40

fragments. So remember, the, the COVID vaccine was made in E.

coli,

um, and in this, which is basically a poop bacteria.

And they put...

They, they, they naturally have plasmids in them,

and those plasmids, which is a s-

it's a loop of DNA, can be adjusted and manipulated to make the

cell produce certain things. So that's why we are looking now at

plasmid DNA, and we were told that, you know, there wouldn't be any,

and then we were told, you know, there would be a ten nanogram limit,

the magic ten

nanogram limit. And so these researchers found

six hundred and twenty-seven times the ten nanogram limit.

It's an absolute nightmare. What McKernan and Rose have,

have turned up is

s- startling. What's even more startling

is the FDA's response, which

is pretty much nothing. So the FDA, when it does respond via

public statements, will just say things like, "The limits

are precautionary and

not absolute, and the agency views these claims as

theoretical misinformation without clinical evidence consistent with

ongoing safety monitoring." There's, there's no ongoing safety

monitoring. They say that long-term use of these vaccines have

not shown any

signal for cancer, despite the fact that they have never even

looked.