Debate on Iran, Regional States and US Military Bases

Only one point was raised, the states of the region,

and we believe that their approach

will not be identical to that of the United States of America

One hundred percent, meaning they also have a different approach.

I mean, the states of the region a lot of taboos were

violated against them in this war,

taboos were broken that had never been broken before,

their civilian facilities were targeted in the first

hours of the war.

So I think the form of the gathering that will happen, the way of dealing

with Iran will be completely different.

Certainly the package of the matrix that existed previously,

the system of incentives and rewards,

or the way of dealing from one state to another differs a bit,

all of this will change.

So there will be a different way of dealing,

even… even… wait, I did not interrupt anyone. Even you, Doctor Liqaa,

there will also be a kind of encirclement of Iran from the region.

I do not believe that

the states of the region will rely on what the United States of America does alone.

Doctor Ali, but there are questions for Doctor Hassan to comment on.

Right, there is… there is…

I mean, there is another party that said

Your guest said that Iran’s relations with the Arab countries have deteriorated.

Fine, they deteriorated, but why? That is an important question.

Why was CENTCOM publishing images of launches against Iran from these countries?

Iran submitted only 260 pages just for the use of the radars,

and it will submit thousands of pages about the rest of the matters that were used

by neighboring countries. So the question is:

Why does the United States carry out this action, then present it to Iran,

then ask these countries to join it against Iran?

This is the most important strategic question, and how do we deal with it?

All right, I accept… I would accept it if, for example,

we understood that the

Iranian argument was to widen the circle of pain and raise the

economic cost on the world. But regarding the bases,

the bases are spread in other places,

meaning not only in Kuwait or in Bahrain or…

they exist in other places around Iran and were not targeted.

I want to comment on what was said…

very briefly, because there is the Israeli issue I want to ask about…

No, no, quickly, quickly, Because Dr.

Hassan said something about how we describe America and Israel,

and I believe we do not disagree on this. Not morally, not historically,

nor otherwise. But

in reality, if America is the greater Satan and Israel is the lesser Satan,

then Iran’s behavior, in how it reflects on the countries of the region,

was not angelic.

The Iranians, in terms of results, were not angels, not in Iraq, nor in Lebanon,

nor in Yemen, nor in Palestine. Now we want to say,

is it the intentions or the results? What happened in Syria, for example,

the Shia of Lebanon today, because of the choices that were made in Syria,

there is a problem that will not be solved in 200, 300 years in that place.

Some groups

in the region were made to bear burdens in the name of serving Iranian influence,

and here this is a project,

the logic of interests is legitimate,

and therefore, when it comes to value- based logic,

either we all speak in a value- based way all the way,

or we speak in the language of interests. Very briefly,

Doctor, one point: Basically, why did Hezbollah enter? You, as a Lebanese,

know that ISIS

It reached your borders and entered Lebanon.

No, I am talking only about Hezbollah…

It entered the fray in defense of…

I think the Syrian issue is more complicated than that.

This is a different matter, please. Mr. Joey, I have a point for Ms. Nejar.