Critique of COVID-19 Vaccine Ethics

My patients,

I focus on the most vulnerable patients,

pregnant women and preborn.

It is difficult to conceive of

a more egregious breach of medical ethics

by the government-controlled medical industrial complex than

the promotion of COVID-19 vaccines to pregnant women,

thereby through transplacental transfer,

effectively vaccinating their unborn and newborn children.

This campaign was not accidental.

It was calculated.

Pregnant women were targeted deliberately for two reasons.

First, women are the primary decision makers

of health here across the human lifespan,

a known marketing principle.

Number two, pregnant women are the most vulnerable patients.

If they could be convinced that

the vaccine was safe and effective,

it would imply that it was safe and effective for everyone.

From the outset of the pandemic,

this vaccine campaign was never grounded in biological science,

but rather in behavioral science,

specifically the manipulation of public perception through influence,

fear and persuasion.

The federal government outsourced much of this psychological operations to

NGOs which disseminated emotionally charged and misleading messaging.

These entities falsely assured pregnant women that

the vaccines were proven safe and essential

for maternal and fetal newborn health,

despite the fact that early evidence indicated quite the opposite.

Pregnancy itself was protective against COVID-19 maternal mortality.

Dr. Jay Winston,

an initiative director at Harvard School of Public Health,

described the government's vaccine marketing approach in a 2020 CBS News interview.

He explained that the strategy was to,

quote, go for the low-hanging fruit,

those easiest to pick and harvest,

end quote.

And the fruit, end quotes,

tragically were pregnant women.

Only this deception was institutionalized

in the now infamous Shimabukuro study

published on April 21st, 2021,

in the digital version of the New England Journal of Medicine.

21 authors claimed the miscarriage rate was 12.6%,

but the raw data revealed an 82%

miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester.

This figure mirrors the effects of chemical abortion drugs such as RU486.

Also, in the same journal edition,

on the same day,

an op-ed appeared by CDC director Rochelle Walensky

and journal editor-in-chief Eric Rubin.

These publications were riddled with conflicts of interest

and deliberate misrepresentations intended to coerce pregnant women into taking vaccines.

Subsequent studies have also claimed that COVID-19 vaccines

are safe and effective during pregnancy and

have been rebuked by respected researchers.

These publications are fundamentally compromised by serious conflicts of interest

ranging from biased funding sources and institutional mandates,

and even threats to their medical licenses and board certifications.

Between 2020 and 2022,

pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion

to reviewers at leading medical journals,

the New England Journal of Medicine,

JAMA, Lancet, and BMJ,

thus corrupting the peer review process.

At least six existing studies,

three from CDC, FDA, and two from Pfizer,

revealed major breaches in safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy.

These findings were ignored.

Conversely,

countless independent researchers with no conflicts of interest

published findings that contradicted the false narratives and

the pharmaceutical industry narratives only to be rewarded by persecution,

censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications.

This is not hypothetical.

It happened to me.