Ethics of Remdesivir in COVID Treatment

Remember

that in 2018, remdesivir, one of my favorite targets,

remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical

trials in Africa because it had a 53% kill rate

published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a

53% kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May of

2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID?

This drug was too unethical to use in an African

clinical trial because it was killing 53% of the people that it

was given

to, and we had Anthony Fauci, Deborah

Birx sitting next to the president going, "We need to use remdesivir,"

despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it

was unethical to use

it. Here's the problem. The problem is as long as the

financial interest that dictates what product

is going to be promoted

is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have

no possibility for accountability.

We have no possibility for justice.

And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the eugenics

office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that same

group of people that were the same group of people

that established the World

Health Organization in 1953, that same group of people are

the ones who are making this decision.

And I don't h- know how you feel about eugenics,

but I have a problem with it.