Critique of Government Defense Policy
What a dangerous report. You call it a democracy shield.
A shield? It's a declaration of war on two fronts.
First, abroad. You demand offensive abilities.
Against whom? And on whose authority?
This Parliament recklessly picks fights, and
when, not if, this escalation backfires, the
citizens will have to pay the price.
Second, at home. You invoke freedom of expression, but
you're building a machinery to restrict, monitor, steer, and
manipulate domestic public debate.
Your Orwellian language fools no one.
Your defense is an attack, and
your freedom is, in fact, totalitarian
control. A shield is meant to protect, but you're not
building a shield. You are building a weapon pointed at
the very people that you were elected to protect.
Shame on you. Shame on you. Thank you.
End of transcript · 129 words