Allegations of Obama Administration Conspiracy

Fox News alert, the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard,

releasing a bombshell report today that shows a conspiracy

by a sitting President, Barack Obama,

and his intel agencies to sabotage the President-elect, Donald Trump,

brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election.

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama

and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment

that they knew was false.

They knew it would promote this contrived narrative

that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win,

selling it to the American people as though it were true.

It wasn't.

Gabbard got her hands on a House intel report

that's been locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade.

Investigators spent over 2,000 hours looking into how the Russia hoax was born,

interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials.

And it turns out that the Obama administration

doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election.

A month after Trump beat Hillary,

Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting

and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment

of how Russia interfered with the election.

This was a highly unusual move.

John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment,

and they were siloed.

None of them knew what the other was doing.

And only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report.

There was nothing routine about this,

and it was a rush job to publish before Trump was sworn in.

Nothing was coordinated with the other intelligence agencies either.

Basically, this was home cooking for Barack Obama.

There were four key elements from the assessment

that were repeated over and over again and

formed the basis of the Russia hoax and the Robert Mueller witch hunt.

One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win.

Two, Putin took action to help Trump win.

Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump.

That was the Steele dossier.

And four, that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign.

None of any of this was ever true.

There was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations.

Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations.

But they were repeatedly overruled by CIA Director Brennan and FBI Director Comey,

who insisted that they be pushed,

even without verifiable evidence.

The Obama administration cherry-picked the intelligence,

lied about their sources,

misquoted sources,

didn't corroborate their claims,

suppressed intelligence that ran counter to their narratives.

and even used anonymous Internet postings.

Rank-and-file CIA admitted what they were doing violated their own tradecraft standards.

There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top.

CIA analysts say they received unusual directives from political appointees,

the CIA director, and Obama himself.

This is how the Russia hoax was born.

Donald Trump knows that the Russians helped him win in 2016.

Putin hated Secretary Clinton so much

that the flip side of that coin

was he had a clear preference for the person

running against the person he hated so much.

It was Russia, in a very systematic way,

in trying to interfere in the election

and to try to advance the prospects of Donald Trump being elected.

This was such a malicious disinformation campaign perpetrated

on the American people that at one point,

60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting machines to help Trump win the White House.

What this report actually shows is that

the Russians just wanted to create chaos and undermine Americans' faith in democracy.

Solid intelligence suggested that Vladimir Putin didn't care who won.

He had no preference.

But like most people, expected Hillary to win and

had a little docket of compromising dirt on her.

Dirt that he never released.

Now, if Putin wanted Trump to win,

why didn't Putin drop the dirt?

There were high-level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's,

quote, psychoemotional problems,

uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness,

and that then-Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers.

Then-CIA Director Brennan and the intelligence community

mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources

to create a contrived false narrative

that Putin developed a, quote, unquote, clear preference for Trump.

Now, if Clinton was on tranquilizers, like the Russians believed,

why didn't they leak it to help Trump win?

How credible was the information about Hillary Clinton's power?

All I have seen is what the intelligence committee have reported through their investigation.

I think that the underlying point there is,

is that we understand from intelligence what Russia said that they had,

and the important point here is that if they were trying to influence the election,

as President Obama and James Clapper and John Brennan,

everybody said they were doing in order to support Donald Trump's election,

they would have released the most damning of that information.

Obama and his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary,

but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did.

Obama and his intel spies knew that Putin didn't collude with Trump,

and that he didn't even direct his people to help Trump win.

But they put it out there anyway.

In a sense,

Barack Obama did exactly what Putin wanted—undermine

Americans' faith in free and fair elections and cause chaos in our country.

Barack Obama, the CIA, and the FBI

were the ones doing what our enemy wanted.

Do you believe that any of this new information

implicates former President Obama in criminal behavior?

We have referred and will continue to refer

all of these documents to the Department of Justice

and the FBI to investigate the criminal implications of this.

For even former President Obama? Correct.

The evidence that we have found and that we have released

directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment.

There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence

that confirm that fact.

Even two years later after the election,

Barack Obama was still pushing a hoax he knew wasn't true.

And he knew it wasn't true because he helped manufacture it.

They're undermining our alliances,

cozying up to Russia.

What happened to the Republican Party?

They're cozying up to the former head of the KGB.

Actively blocking legislation that would defend our elections from Russian attack.

What happened?

Now, I don't know if it's possible to indict a former president

for actions he took while in office.

I'm not a lawyer, proudly.

But Brennan, Comey, and others may have severe liability.

Trey Gowdy says we know for a fact

that Brennan committed perjury when he lied to Congress.

Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the Steele dossier?

I don't.

Do you know if the Bureau ever relied on the Steele dossier

as any as part of any court filings, applications?

I have no awareness.

Did the CIA rely on it? No.

Why not? Because we didn't.

It wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had.

It was not in any way used as a basis for

the intelligence community assessment that was done.

It was not.

Well, that's a lie.

Whatever happens to these guys is not revenge.

It's accountability.