Philip K. Dick's Exploration of Reality
In September of 1977, science fiction author
Philip K. Dick walked onto a stage in Metz, France,
and made
an extraordinary claim.
The title of my address is
If You Find This World Bad, You Should See Some of the Others.
I would like to confess
that I've been asked to cut about two-thirds of my speech out
and deliver as short a speech as possible.
Upon examining my speech, I find that it is very easy to remove
two-thirds without doing any injury to it.
I even considered cutting three-thirds out of it-
... but, uh, there was some trouble, so I abandoned that idea.
The subject of this speech
is a topic
which has been discovered recently
and which may not exist at all. I may be talking about something
that does not
exist. Therefore, I'm free to say everything or nothing.
Dick was not saying that he had predicted the future, not
that his
novels contained secret messages.
His claim was something much stranger.
He told them that some of the worlds that he spent decades writing
about might have actually existed.
Dick had spent his career constructing unstable
realities, worlds where history had taken a different
path, worlds where the dead continued living,
worlds manufactured by artificial systems, worlds
where memory couldn't be trusted, worlds where reality itself
seemed to malfunction. And then in 1974,
Dick reported experiences that he interpreted as a
malfunction in reality. Three years later, Dick
attempted to explain what happened.
His theory was called orthogonal time.
Orthogonal or right angle time is the topic of my speech.
We are accustomed to supposing that all change takes
place along the linear time axis from past to present to future.
The present is an accrual of the past and is different from it.
The future will accrue from the present on and be different yet.
That an orthogonal or right angle time axis could exist,
a lateral domain in which change takes place,
processes occurring sideways in reality, so to speak, this is
almost impossible to imagine. How would we perceive such
lateral changes? What would we experience?
What clues, if we are trying to test out this bizarre
theory,
should we be on the alert for? In other words, how can change
take place outside of linear time at all in any sense to
any degree?
Dick proposed that reality might be continuously altered
along this hidden axis. Other presence, other worlds,
other versions of history, and if the process worked correctly,
we wouldn't notice. Our memories would change with it.
Our history would change with it. We would simply wake up
inside the new world convinced it had always been that way.
Let me present you with a metaphor.
Let us say that there exists this very rich patron of the arts.
Every day on the wall of his living room above his fireplace, his servants
hang a new picture, each day a different masterpiece,
day after
day, month after month. Each day the used one is
removed and replaced by a different and new one.
I shall call this process change along the linear axis.
But now let us suppose the servants temporarily running out of new
replacement pictures.
What shall they do in the meantime?
They can't just leave the present one hanging.
Their employer has decreed that perpetual replacement, that is to say
changing the pictures, is to take place.
So they neither allow the current one to remain, nor do they replace it
with a new one. Instead, they do a very clever thing.
When their employer is not looking, the servants cunningly alter
the picture already on the wall. They paint out a tree
here, they paint in a little girl there, they add
this, they obliterate that. They make the same
painting different and in a sense new, but as I'm
sure you can see, not new in the sense of replacing it.
The employer enters his living room after dinner, seats himself
facing the fireplace, and contemplates what should be,
according to
his expectations, a new picture.
What does he see? It certainly isn't what he saw previously,
but also it isn't somehow...
And here we must become very sympathetic with this perhaps somewhat stupid
man because we can virtually see his brain circuits striving to
understand. His brain circuits are saying, "Yes, it is a new picture.
It is not the same one as yesterday,
but also it is the same one, I think.
I feel on a very deep intuitive basis, I feel that somehow I've seen it
before. I seem to remember a tree, though, and there is no
tree."
The painting remains in the same position, but its information
has changed. Reality doesn't merely move.
Reality is edited, unless something went
wrong, unless some fragment remained, a dream,
a strange memory, deja vu, a
feeling that something had changed.
Dick even developed a name for the intelligence
responsible for modifying the system, the
programmer-reprogrammer, and opposing it was
another intelligence, the dark counterplayer
Reality in Dick's model was not an object.
It was a process, a game, a continuously
revised information system, and human beings lived
inside the printout. The strangest part is that Philip K.
Dick did not arrive at this idea while writing a science fiction
novel. He believed he had experienced something
that
led him to it.
It was almost as if
I had been insane all my life,
and suddenly I had become sane.
Before Philip K. Dick began questioning whether our reality
was
real, he built an entire career around the
question.
Not space travel, not laser guns, not even artificial
intelligence. The reoccurring problem under Philip K.
Dick's work was much more fundamental.
How do you know the world around you is actually what you think it is?
In The Man in the High Castle, history itself is different.
The Axis powers won the Second World War, but within that
alternate history exists another book describing yet
another timeline. Reality nestled inside
counter reality. In Ubik, characters gradually
discover the world around them is deteriorating.
And in Flow My Tears, the policeman said, celebrity Jason
Taverner wakes up to discover something impossible.
Everyone has forgotten him. His identity has
vanished. His records are gone. His fame is
gone. Reality has apparently rewritten
itself and left him behind. This
obsession existed long before 1974.
Counterfeit worlds, false memories, artificial humans,
alternative histories, invisible control
systems.
Reality breaking down around people who suddenly realize that the
rules were never what-
End of transcript · 1,097 words