Analysis of a High-Profile Shooting Case

10 months, 10 months of Egyptian planes,

maroon shirts, energy weapons, palm pistols, hand signals.

What about that guy that got up and said he shot Charlie?

A 30 06 could never do that.

That's not the entry wound, that's the exit wound. He was shot from behind.

10 months, 10 months of this,

and you're telling me the entire time they had a video of him doing it?

This whole time, ever since September 10th, the prosecution had a video

of Tyler Robinson climbing to the roof, taking the shot,

taking apart the rifle, and going away?

According to people who were at the hearing, they say that is exactly what the

video shows.

Now, you would think

that all of this evidence would put the case to rest, right?

Charlie Kirk was struck in the neck,

died instantly, one shot, one kill, one entry wound, no exit wound.

We got the murder weapon, we have the killer's DNA on it,

we got video of him placing him at the campus,

video of him pulling the trigger.

He confessed, his parents turned him in,

the boyfriend testified he confessed, we got text messages,

Discord messages, a written note.

You would think that would be enough,

but rest assured, here's how it's going to go.

Today, the conspiracy crowd says, that video is not as described.

We have not seen the video.

We don't believe what you're saying about what the video shows.

So what happens when the video comes out?

Now, like I said, I'm withholding judgment.

We haven't seen it, we don't know.

This is how it's been related and represented to us by people that have

seen it firsthand. But if or when,

when this video is revealed to the public, and it

shows precisely what people said it did,

are people going to put this to bed and say,

it's over, Tyler Robinson's a killer, case closed?

I think they'll just say it's AI.

That's how all the other

evidence has been treated so far.

If we have video of Tyler Robinson on the scene, those were decoys.

If we find DNA on the rifle, they say it's fake, the methodology's flawed.

If we have a text confession,

well, why did they take a screenshot of it? Oh, they have the data?

Well, the software to retrieve the data came from Israel.

And why would he confess anyway? Would you confess?

I don't know. I'm not a 19 year old that assassinates a turning point guy, maybe.

That's how all the other evidence has been treated.

So what do you think is going to happen when we finally get the video of Tyler

Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk?

As we all know he did,

oh, they'll just say it's fake too. That's fake. Are we sure it's him?

That doesn't really look like him. It's grainy. It's a decoy. It's a body double.

It's artificial intelligence.

But it is truly mind blowing that it has gotten this far.

People pulling on every thread, exhausting literally supernatural explanations.

We literally arrived at time travel and magical powers and the astral realm.

Not exaggerating,

those are all things that were said with complete sincerity before people would

just say, yeah, a left wing teenager, a left wing autistic teenager

shot a right wing activist. Like, that's the craziest thing.

Oh, it's a big coincidence. I don't know.

I feel like that's kind of happening all the time.