Moon Landing Conspiracy Theories Explained

And the government faked the moon landing was basically it was

technically impossible to do it, and they simply had to come

up with some sort of alternative that they felt the

public would believe.

I believe, had they wanted to, that NASA could indeed

have pulled off the greatest hoax of all time, never sent anyone

to the moon, and recreated it in a television studio.

Can you realize that we, that you and I, that all of

us, have actually begun the exploration of

another

world?

The United States Geological Survey decided to build a model

of one part of the lunar surface in an area accessible to

present research centers.

Four,

three,

two,

one. Fire.

Reflections of studio lights, accidental movie props, repeating

backdrops. There's a lot of evidence suggesting

that the moon landing wasn't filmed

on the moon, but on a sound stage. The lunar module engine puts

out three thousand pounds of thrust, and the lunar surface is covered with

dust that was described as fine powder.

If that's true, why did the engine leave no mark on the

surface?

And shouldn't there be dust everywhere? Even the footpads are clean and shiny.

So either the landing module was sitting there, or it

was gently lowered

down by a crane. And you'd have to lower the thing gently.

Look at it.

It looks like tinfoil and curtain rods held together by duct

tape.

More evidence that a crane was used is when the astronauts separate from the

module and return to orbit for pickup. Look at this.

The module separates, and the astronauts gently lift back to

orbit.

And look how slowly it moves. Where's the rocket plume from the engine?

What's allowing this to fly all the way to orbit?

If you watch the footage closely, it looks like the object

is wobbling a little on

cables or wires. By the way, who shot this footage?

There was no camera remote control, but somehow the scene is framed perfectly.

They're zooming in and out. The camera tracks the object up into the

sky,

but conveniently loses the object when it gets too high.

But the camera does pan around the surface. Who's working the camera?

Now, speaking of cables and wires, look at this footage.

Does this look natural, or does it look like he's being lifted by

wires?

Uh, Houston, Apollo eleven. How do you read?

Uh, Apollo eleven, this is Houston. Uh, go ahead.

Roger. Uh, lem looks to be in, uh, pretty fine shape.

Uh,

about all we can see, uh, from here.

Okay. And, uh, in reference to your question on the, uh,

step

thirteen on the decal,

uh, I understand that, uh, you used up, uh, the contents

of the repress O-two package. And at that time,

instead of being,

uh-

Then there's this footage of Neil and Buzz putting up the American flag.

But if they were both on the moon's surface, who's shooting the footage?

And how is the flag waving if there's no atmosphere on the moon?

Now, sure, we've been told that there was an aluminum tube holding up the flag,

but it seems to be moving around a lot.

Now, here's a picture of what an Apollo

astronaut spacesuit looked like.

But look at the soles of the shoes. They don't look anything like the

footprints

the astronauts supposedly made in the lunar dust.

And what about the heat? The surface temperature on the moon during

the day is over

two-hundred-fifty degrees Fahrenheit. That's as hot as an oven.

The film inside their cameras should have melted.

But there are thousands of pictures that all came out perfectly fine.

Well, fine, except for the whole wrong shadows,

no stars, movie props,

visible lights, and stuff being hoisted by cranes.

Right. Except for that. And there are plenty of photos that are

flat-out doctored. If you remember our episode on NASA's Mars

cover-up, we proved that the photos of Mars

were altered before being released

to the public. This is a technique perfected during Apollo.

The Apollo handheld cameras had special crosshairs on them called Rousseau

marks. And these were here to help make sure the photos

were printed properly from

the negatives and not distorted, and to make it easier to stitch photos

together

for panoramas. But in some of the photos, the crosshairs aren't

there or are only in part of the picture.

In other photographs, objects appear in front of the crosshairs.

Now, that's physically impossible unless the

objects were added after the photo

was taken by layering them on top of empty backgrounds.

And there are even more problems with the photography.

Here's a picture of an Apollo astronaut saluting the American flag.

But look at his feet. The shadows don't even reach them.

It's like he was edited in later and somebody forgot to add a shadow.

Now, even if we could explain all these

anomalies in the photos, there's

a big reason why nobody can get to the moon, a reason why human beings can't

leave Earth at all, at least not yet.

The reason is real and scientifically proven as fact.

Radiation.