Critique of Public School History Curriculum
Why don't our public
schools teach that there was no federal income tax in America from 1776
all the way till 1913?
We had a temporary tax imposed during the Civil War, and they tried again in 1894,
but the income tax was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Pollock v.
Farmers. And that is when Rockefeller got involved.
The 16th Amendment that would change the Constitution was proposed
by Nelson Aldrich, the father in law of John D.
Rockefeller Jr., the same guy that proposed the Federal Reserve Act.
And of course the Rockefellers would take over the tax system,
the money printing system, the medical system, the education system,
and became a driving force behind climate change narratives, to name a few things.
But our kids aren't taught any of this in school.
Instead, they're taught that
Keynesian economic theory is correct, that increased
taxes and increased government spending make a strong economy, and even the
playing field with the rich,
which is pretty convenient for a government education program.
And pretty interesting considering.
Then they cement this ideological
indoctrination into young people by making emotional arguments like,
shouldn't we be able to feed the poor,
that before 1913 America had the fastest growing middle class in the world,
and what cities like Detroit were like back
then compared to what they've become and why that is.
But you tell me, who does the education system actually serve?
And this is why I'm so into teaching real history,
teaching financial literacy, because our kids will do great.
We just have to teach them how
the world Check out my private homeschool community.
And Cubs to Bears books.
ClassicalLearner com
End of transcript · 282 words