Allegations of Election Interference by Obama

Fox News alert, the Director of National Intelligence,

Tulsi Gabbard, releasing a bombshell report today that shows

a conspiracy by a sitting President, Barack Obama,

and his intel agencies to sabotage the President elect, Donald Trump,

brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election.

There is irrefutable evidence that

detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of

an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false.

They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered

in the 2016 election to help President Trump win,

selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't.

Gabbard got her hands on a House intel report that's been locked away in a CIA

vault for almost a decade.

Investigators spent over 2 000 hours looking into how the Russia hoax was born,

interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials, and it turns out that the

Obama administration doctored the intelligence

to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election.

A month after Trump beat Hillary,

Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his

CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election.

This was a highly unusual move.

John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment,

and they were siloed.

None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in

charge of drafting this report.

There was nothing routine about this,

and it was a rush job to publish before Trump was sworn in.

Nothing was coordinated with the other intelligence agencies either.

Basically, this was home cooking for Barack Obama.

There were four key elements from the assessment that were repeated over

and over again and formed the basis of the Russia

hoax and the Robert Mueller witch hunt.

One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win.

Two, Putin took action to help Trump win.

Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump. That was the Steele dossier.

And four, that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign.

None of any of this was ever true.

There was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations.

Senior CIA officials

repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but they were repeatedly

overruled by CIA Director Brennan and FBI Director Comey,

who insisted that they be pushed,

even without verifiable evidence.

The Obama administration cherry picked the intelligence,

lied about their sources, misquoted sources,

didn't corroborate their claims, suppressed intelligence

that ran counter to their narratives, and even used anonymous internet postings.

Rank and file

CIA admitted what they were doing violated their own tradecraft standards.

There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top.

CIA analysts say they received unusual directives from political appointees,

the CIA director, and Obama himself.

This is how the Russia hoax was born.

Donald Trump knows that the Russians helped him win in 2016.

Putin hated Secretary Clinton so much that the flip side of

that coin was he had a clear preference for the person running against the person

he hated so much. It was Russia in a

very systematic way in trying to interfere in the

election and to try to advance the prospects of Donald Trump being elected.

This was such a malicious disinformation

campaign perpetrated on the American people that at one point,

60 of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting

machines to help Trump win the White House.

What this report actually shows is that the Russians just wanted to create chaos and

undermine Americans' faith in democracy.

Solid intelligence suggested that Vladimir Putin didn't care who won.

He had no preference.

But like most people, expected Hillary to win and had

a little docket of compromising dirt on her, dirt that he never released.

Now if Putin wanted Trump to win,

why didn't Putin drop the dirt?

There were high level DNC emails that

detailed evidence of Hillary's quote, psychoemotional problems,

uncontrolled fits of anger,

aggression, and cheerfulness, and that then Secretary

Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers.

Then CIA Director Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized

intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived

false narrative that Putin developed a quote unquote clear preference for Trump.

Now if Clinton was on tranquilizers like the Russians believed,

why didn't they leak it to help Trump win?

How credible was the information that Hillary Clinton was telling?

All I have seen is what the intelligence committee

have reported through their investigation.

I think the underlying point there is that we understand from intelligence

what Russia said that they had,

and the important point here is that if they were trying to influence the election,

as President Obama and James Clapper and John Brennan,

everybody said they were doing in order to support Donald Trump's election,

they would have released the

most damning of that information.

Obama and his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary,

but they cooked the

intelligence to make it look like he did.

Obama and his intel spies knew that Putin didn't collude with Trump and that he

didn't even direct his people to help Trump win,

but they put it out there anyway.

In a sense, Barack Obama did exactly what Putin wanted,

undermine American's faith in free and fair elections and cause chaos

in our country.

Barack Obama, the CIA, and

the FBI were the ones doing what our enemy wanted.

Do you believe that

any of this new information implicates former President Obama in criminal behavior?

We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents to the

Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate the criminal implications of this.

For even former President Obama? Correct.

The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point

to President Obama

leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment.

There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact.

Even two years later, after the election,

Barack Obama was still pushing a hoax he knew wasn't true.

And he knew it wasn't true because he helped manufacture it.

They're undermining our alliances, cozying up to Russia.

What happened to the Republican Party?

They're cozying up to the former head of the KGB,

actively blocking legislation

that would defend our elections from Russian attack. What happened?

Now, I don't know if it's possible to indict a former president for actions he

took while in office. I'm not a lawyer, proudly.

But Brennan, Comey, and others may have severe liability.

Trey Gowdy says we know for a fact that Brennan committed perjury when he

lied to Congress.

Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the Steele dossier?

I don't. Do you know if the Bureau ever relied on the Steele dossier as

part of any court filings, applications? I have no awareness.

Did the CIA rely on it? Why not?

Because we didn't.

It wasn't part of the

corpus of intelligence information that we had.

It was not in any way

used as a basis for the intelligence community assessment that was done.

It was not.

That's a lie.

Whatever happens to these guys is not revenge. It's accountability.

And it's time for people to pay the price.