Discussion on UFO Agreements and Diplomacy

Um, do you think that we've made agreements with the

beings?

Yes. Um,

for several reasons. I mean,

uh, the most defensible is just from an analysis

of the situation. You know, I come from international

affairs, uh, diplomatic history, you know,

international competition. And so looking at behavior to

kind of, uh, divine intent, you know, capabilities only get you

so far in, in that realm. The behavior, especially between

human, um, human players involved

doesn't... Is, it does not seem explainable,

uh, unless there is some sort of agreement,

uh, both between

nations and imposed or arrived at,

uh, between them and the third parties, uh, specifically related to, like, the

secrecy measures, the lack of any sort of public

or official disclosure.

Um, the, the military arrangements we've had in,

in formal treaties, like

there's that 1970-something outer space treaty where we agreed to,

like, notify each other, uh, if we detect UFOs.

Um, that's, that's ac- I mean, that's straight up an example of an

agreement.

Yeah. It's open source. Anybody can look it up.

Mm-hmm.

I think it's 1971 SALT talks between, uh, you know,

the US and, uh, Soviets, and they're saying, "We have to coordinate

around, you know, UFOs showing up in sensitive airspace."

So...

Yeah.

Yeah.

And that there's some, you know, bits and information kinda picked up from the

inside and

since then from people that are

positioned to know that, that points towards, yeah, there

is at least some basic sort of set of

agreements between the United States and some sort of third party, and

most likely

other countries have some sort of similar--

or alliance blocks have some sort of

similar arrangement.

What do you think we're conceding and what do you think we're gaining

through these

agreements?

I don't know if we gain that much. Uh, I don't think,

I don't think any level of altruism has been displayed.

I think it's more,

uh-

So we're being submitted essentially.

Yes.

We have to make-

But what we're-

We have to make these agreements.

Yeah. Or maybe, you know, also just ag-

agreements doesn't always have to be an exchange.

It could be

being brought into awareness that, you know, these are the rules.

Um, you now,

humans, because of your capabilities and population spread, are

being, you know,

uh,

rising to our level of attention. This is kind of how Earth operates at a certain

level, so you need to do these things to stay in

sort of the

established, uh, precedence of, of life on

Earth. Um...

Yeah.

Interesting. And, and, uh, w- what do you think they're

getting out of it? Because if they're, you know, 360 dominating us,

why even, you know, engage in some sort of e- e- explicit di-

diplomacy versus just, like, you know, take what you want and, you know, come

and go as you please?

Yeah. Uh, so to set the foundation for that, I

mean, starting to be more open,

um,

I have learned that it is the oral tradition in the legacy

program itself that agreements were struck between the United States

and a

third party,

uh,

in possession of this technology, and that that agreement in broad

terms w- has two kind of,

uh,

arrangements. One was that there's certain areas

that the United States,

uh, within its borders, you know, needs to stay away from, that that is

essentially, uh, someone else's territory.

So no developments there, no military operations there, no

commercial or human activity. Um,

that's one area and, of the agreement.

And then the other side is some sort of access and c-

access to and communication with humans of their choice.

Hmm.

And that that is the nature of at least one

very old agreement, um, sometime

in the Truman and Eisenhower era, uh, that was arrived at.

Um,

I'm sure that there are things in the lore that give more

detail. Um, I can't speak to the validity of, of those

things, but I'm just sharing that now that that is, uh,

in, in the legacy program itself, um, at least

a, a line of, um,

not thought, but

narrative.