Francis Boyle’s Claims About COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines and Bioweapons

I will start with the statement of Joseph Sansone.

It is based on the sworn

statement of the late Professor Dr.

Francis Boyle, who has determined and concluded.

Professor Boyle is the greatest authority in the field of

bioweapons legislation.

He is the author of it,

so he knows what is legally meant by it.

He knew like no other that the COVID-19

mRNA injection is a bioweapon.

He has also made that loud and clear to the world, known,

after which, despite being in good

health, he passed away shortly after

he had declared himself willing to give

testimony under oath about this in

court.

The core of Professor Boyle's argument is that the

COVID-19 mRNA injections contain

derivatives of illegal military gene function

research.

As a result, the COVID-19 injections qualify by

definition as a military biological weapon

system. A bioweapon, in other words.

This bioweapon consists of two integrated components,

the pathogenic load

and the delivery mechanism.

It is beyond doubt that the

pathogenic load is the product of

illegal gene or function research.

Boyle refers to this

to an article in the scientific journal Nature Medicine,

of which I have included the link in this plea note.

If you open that link, you will immediately read the warning that

true scientists believe

that an animal

is the most likely

source of the coronavirus.

You will also immediately know that what is called the new normal,

true scientists, are not scientists, but faith

fanatics.

These are the scientists behind whom the respondents hide.

The article in Nature Medicine that Boyle reports on

was published in two thousand and fifteen,

and the title reads, translated,

A Cluster of Circulating Coronaviruses in Bats

Similar to SARS Shows Potential for Human

Infection.

I present to you

what the summary of this research included in the article

reveals.

It states, based on these findings, we have

synthetically created an infectious,

fully SHC zero fourteen recombinant virus

developed and demonstrated robust viral replication,

both in vitro and in vivo.

So it states,

we researchers have created a SARS-like

coronavirus with a spike protein

optimized for human infection.

I cannot provide a better example of illegal gain of function

research.

And who wrote that article from two thousand and fifteen?

Among others, researchers affiliated with UNC Chapel

Hill and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Wuhan.

Yes, Wuhan. You know, where according to the official

narrative,

people suddenly dropped dead on the street

when COVID-19

broke out because

there was a bat mutated.

The spike protein, the pathogenic payload of the bioweapon,

is the result of this research.

So it's not about a

natural spike protein, but an

illegally developed, synthetically made pathogen

that has been optimized for human infection.

The spike protein mRNA with the instructions to human

cells to produce this very pathogenic spike protein

is one of the two crucial building

blocks of the COVID-19

bioweapon.

Now the delivery system, the NLPs, you know, the

nanolipid particles that encapsulate the mRNA payload and

deliver it into the interior of the cells.

The propaganda term for this is fat globules,

as if we're talking about

something as harmless as a stick of butter.

What did Boyle declare about it?

Boyle declared that it is actually about

a nanotechnology-enhanced delivery

platform. This technology is, as Boyle

declared, paid for, developed, financed, and

conceived by the Pentagon and its research institute, DARPA.

This technology platform,

nanotechnology

platform, was not an afterthought.

Dr. Boyle points out that the virus itself was aerosolized and

engineered with nanotechnology from the very beginning.

This indicates a long-term program aimed at the application

of advanced delivery systems,

and this technology has been used in the COVID-19 injections.

Boyle determined

that the NLP delivery system in the

injections is the result of a specific

teacher-sponsored program for nanotechnological

biological weapons.

In the presentation

by Sansone, you can read further about the legal

implications of this.

It is also argued that Gates and Bourla

qualify as suspects of crimes against

humanity as defined in the Rome Statute concerning

the International Criminal Court