Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Data

Proper scientific inquiry often involves coming up with a

design plan and then sticking to it to see what the results are.

One way or another, this way you don't introduce bias.

CDC, I guess to its credit,

did come up with a design plan of how it was gonna analyze VAERS

data, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting

System, when it came to COVID-19

vaccines. It came up with something called PRR,

proportional reporting

ratio, and anything above a two would be

considered

significant and would require further inquiry because it would be deemed a

safety

signal. After the COVID-19 vaccine was rolled out,

that analysis began, and we submitted, on behalf of ICAN, a FOIA

request for the PRR results at the CDC.

Did they find any safety signals in the VAERS data?

Were there any harms that had a PRR over two?

And when we finally got to see that data, it showed

incredibly concerning results. The CDC's own

predetermined approach to analyzing VAERS data showed that there were

many harms. In fact, the very same harms that people

were reporting had

PRR numbers that weren't three, four, five.

They were 30, 50, 100,

multiple times the

upper threshold of two that the CDC had predetermined.

If it goes above a two, that's a safety signal,

and we should be concerned.

When the CDC was confronted with, "Hey, aren't you terribly concerned?

This was your own objective, scientific approach to

assess is there a safety signal in the COVID-19 VAERS data,

it showed incredibly concerning outcomes." And the CDC said, "You know what?

We're not gonna rely on PRR analysis anymore.

We're gonna rely instead on something called empirical Bayesian analysis, EB

analysis, conducted by the FDA." And so ICAN said, "Fine,

let's take a look at what that shows." On behalf of ICAN,

we submitted FOIA

requests for the EB data at the FDA. And guess what?

The FDA wouldn't give it to us. Two federal lawsuits until we

finally, after a lot of litigation, got that data, and that

data, too, is very concerning. All

the data, the PRR analysis, as well as the EB data,

is all available on the ICAN website.

I encourage everybody, including independent scientists,

to look at it, analyze it, publish on it.

It just is more data that confirms what the V-safe data

has shown: incredibly concerning reports of

harm from the COVID-19 vaccine. The most concerning

part is how our federal health officials acted and

conducted themselves when the data showed that harm.

They hid it from the public, and without ICAN support

and years of litigation, it would probably to this day remain

hidden.