Critique of European Commission's COVID Response

Good afternoon,

everyone.

The president of the European Commission,

Ursula von der Leyen, is part of a

gigantic COVID 19 scientific fraud and propaganda

campaign that caused and continue

to cause massive violations of human rights, freedom,

and is a threat to the democracy in Europe.

Because of her actions and major conflicts of interest,

she should resign from her position as the president of the Commission.

Now some details to support this.

As we all know, it's in the media,

the president was involved in the private communication with the CEO of Pfizer

before signing the purchase agreement with this private company,

but refused to disclose the content of this communication.

This is a clear violation of principles of transparency and good public

administration.

Second, according to the disclosed segments of the agreement with Pfizer,

and not all parts are disclosed,

and which is another violation of the same principles,

the European Commission has to coordinate external communication

with this private commercial entity and to support COVID 19 vaccines as

a global public good.

This is not science. This is not good governance.

This is an execution of vaccine business plan, and the president of the

European Commission acts

as the chief sales representative of this business.

Three, as a result of this commitment,

Ms. von der Leyen has been actively advocating vaccination as the only way to

end the pandemic. This is a lie.

There have been efficient

and not expensive medical treatment protocols from the start of the pandemic.

Now, thousands of doctors around the world are testifying this,

but the president of the commission has been ignoring this all along.

Four, Pfizer, after signing the contract with the commission on May 20, 2021,

claimed in their press release that pandemic is likely to last

for several more years, and we all will have

to be vaccinated a number of times.

How can they know that,

and why the president of the European Commission has to subscribe to this notion?

Number five, the commission has been cooperating with social networks on so called

fact checking, in other words,

censorship of scientific and public debates about COVID 19.

This collaboration was announced as early as 10th of June,

2020, and is one of the main driving elements of COVID 19 propaganda.

Six, according to the official declaration of interest of President von der Leyen,

her husband,

Heiko von der Leyen, is the medical director of biopharmaceutical company,

is also an advisor to another company, consulting firm for German and

European healthcare market.

Since Ms. Ursula von der Leyen is actively involved in

active promotion of COVID 19 vaccination business,

this is another major conflict of interest of hers.

Because of all this,

she has to resign from her position as the president of the European Commission,

and I call on the leadership

of all political groups and leadership of the European Parliament to support

this request, and to finally create an

investigative committee of COVID 19 pandemic.

People of the European Union need answers from this parliament on how and why this

pandemic started, how it was managed,

and how to prevent it from happening again. Thank you.

Thank you so much, Cecis.

I would like to give the floor now to my colleague, Ivan Sinčić, from Croatia.

Thank you very much, Mr. Terhes.

Thank you very much, dear colleagues, dear guests.

I would like to say a few words about mandates,

especially digital COVID certificate mandates, and of course vaccine mandates,

especially in the light of an idea that comes from the European institutions

about prolonging for one year, that means to 2023,

the digital COVID certificate.

I will say it loud and clear, we are strongly against that.

Digital COVID certificate has been proven completely useless, not just useless,

it was proven to be backfiring, to be counter effective.

It gives people a false sense of security.

It has become a tool of pandemic marketing, forcing people, now

governments are openly admitting it,

that it was a tool to put pressure on the people to take the vaccines.

The DGC itself is undemocratic. It is blackmailing.