Discussion on Lindsay Clancy Trial

What we are seeing is that it is not safe for women to have

children in the United States with this Lindsay Clancy trial.

Oh, man, this should be good.

Lindsay Clancy was clearly in postpartum

psychosis, which can happen to any woman that gives

birth. It happens one to two times out of every

1,000 births.

Yeah, one to two out of every thousand is not common.

I'm not sure if you suck at math or what.

Also, I think it's pretty insane that you say she was clearly undergoing

postpartum

psychosis when all of her psychiatrists and doctors, including the one who

saw her the day before she killed her kids, said that that wasn't the case.

But again, I know you women who support Lindsay

Clancy think you know more than all

of the doctors.

That means 10 to 20 a day of women that give birth

in the United States.

I hope you understand that not all women who undergo postpartum

psychosis have

thoughts of killing their children.

Now, if you're gonna make that argument that, well,

it's a risk for all of these

women, and it's a hormonal change, and there's really nothing we can do to

actually

prevent postpartum psychosis from occurring with all of these women,

and they could

potentially lash out and kill their own children due to this,

I hope you

understand you're now presenting an argument for people to make

that I think is

a pretty good one, both on a moral and legal level, that mothers should

have their children taken away from them on the basis of, well, they could have

postpartum psychosis, they could lose control of themselves,

and they could kill

their children. That's what you're saying.

This woman did everything correctly to try to get

help.

No, she actually didn't. In fact, she lied to her doctors, told them

that she

wasn't suicidal, that she didn't have any plans of taking

the lives of her

children, and she even checked herself out of a

psych ward or a mental

hospital after saying she wasn't suicidal.

Like, if you believe that she was having these psychotic episodes,

which even she

doesn't claim that, she says that it was only an 18 to 20-minute period, which

conveniently is the time where she killed her children, but if you believe, which

you clearly do, that she was undergoing these things, which

are now excuses

in retrospect, then you would also have to agree

that she was lying because she

told her doctors that she wasn't having any of these

particular thoughts.

So you can't have it both ways. This is what all of you women do.

You argue on one hand, "Oh, she was undergoing all of these things,

all of these

thoughts. She was suicidal, all of this and that",

while at the same time arguing,

"No, it was a psychotic episode that she couldn't control".

It- you can't have both of those things.

They are torturing her through court with

tons of different pictures that she has to sit through,

awful explanations. They are torturing this woman.

Yeah, those pictures are evidence because her three children

are dead because she

killed them. The jury has to determine what happened to

those three children.

The medical examiners have to explain how they died.

I'm sorry you think that that's torturing Lindsay.

I'm sorry that she just has to go through a trial regarding the death of her three

children that she's responsible for.

Trying to say that she didn't really try to hurt herself, she was

not in psychosis, to punish all women.

Of course. All of you women at home who have nothing

to do with this, you're the

victims, not the three children who are dead. You.