Discussion on Historical Exploitation and Anti-Semitism

So things get really deep when you look into the tiny hats

and slavery.

Yes, this was left out of the history books,

'cause guess who owns the history

books? Those tiny hats over here. And when we look at who owned all

the slaves and were the slave traders and the auctioneers? Tiny hats.

And who owned the newspapers? Tiny hats.

And then who also created the division?

Oh, I think you're starting to understand it.

And then you also find about the exploitation of the slaves

and how they treated people. Obviously, they're not gonna tell anybody this

part. And then it also gets interesting

when you find out that the tiny hats were

defending that they should stay slaves.

Isn't that interesting? And people would say, "No,

that would never happen."

Really, slave dealing was an extremely profitable business.

And this is where it always ties back to the Rothschilds, like I've always talked

about. Even Malcolm X talked about this. People should look into this.

And, uh, a Negro is not anti-Semitic when he says that the, the man

who's exploiting him in his community is white, because it

is a white man who owns

all the stores. Now, is it a- an accident that these whites who own

these

stores are Jewish? If it's an accident, then, uh, the fact that he says, "The

Jew on the corner is exploiting me," isn't an anti-Semitic statement.

It's just more descriptive of the man who's exploiting him.