False Flags and Military Pretexts

Every war or military coalition needs a pretext.

A threat so great that the whole world will believe it.

But what if no pretext exists?

Dry anthrax, a little bit, about this amount.

This is just about the amount of a teaspoon.

They took the babies out of the incubators.

They invent one

with a false flag,

an operation or a threat carried out in the enemy's name,

large enough that punishing the accused seems

obligatory to everyone.

For 70 years, this device has decided major wars

and major punishments.

Cairo,

1954. Explosions in cinemas and American

centers. The blame falls on Egyptians.

Two men are executed. Years later, the official

archives of Israel's Ministry of Defense stated plainly,

"The bombings were the work of Israeli spies."

And 51 years later, they themselves officially

honored those same agents.

Baghdad, 1950.

Bombings in cafes and Jewish neighborhoods.

The result, the migration of hundreds of thousands of

Iraqi

Jews to Israel.

And later it becomes clear,

this too was the work of the Israelis themselves.

The Mediterranean, 1967.

The height of the Six Day War. The American reconnaissance ship,

Liberty, comes under fire.

34 American sailors are killed. The plan:

accuse Egypt and drag the United States into the war for

Israel's benefit. And when the affair is exposed,

only two words are announced:

operational error.

And this pattern is repeated again and again.

Assassinations and operations in different parts of the world.

And of course, the most important of them, the false narratives built

around October 7th.

February 28, 2026.

War is imposed on Iran for 40 days

and nights, and the origin of many of the attacks is

American bases in the countries of the Persian Gulf.

Iran, in turn, strikes those same bases.

But in these 40 days, the pattern repeats once more.

Attacks of unknown origin against countries in the region, and

the accusation is always in Iran's name.

I said, even the fact that they've attacked all of their

neighbors.

And each time, Tehran gives one iron answer:

false flag. Day three of the war. Aramco's

refineries in flames. The accusation is

fired in the very first hours. Iran.

But the drones have been intercepted and the media pull back the

curtain.

It was Israel's work.

Day five.

A ballistic missile in the skies of Hatay, Turkey.

The first time the sky of a NATO member is targeted.

The plan: bring NATO into the war.

One day later,

Nakhchivan Airport hit by drones.

Baku holds Iran responsible. The aim is

clear: drag Azerbaijan into war against

Iran.

Tehran officially denies both.

But the climax comes after the ceasefire.

August 17, midnight. Two suicide

drones strike Masrour Barzani's office in Erbil.

And again, the finger of accusation points at

Iran.

But Tehran's answer is the key to the puzzle.

Iran's operations are all announced officially and

explicitly.

Every attack, an accusation. Every

accusation, a fabricated narrative.

40 days of war,

and the list of false flags longer than ever.

And this pattern does not end.

Britain. Three suspicious vans near RAF Fairford.

No bomb, no evidence. And yet, once again,

an accusation laid at Iran's door.

Days later, another claim. A co-pilot with a knife on

a Dubai-Tel Aviv flight.

And the savior of the incident? An Israeli passenger.

No clear motive, no evidence. And it is plain that

this too is another provocation.

From Cairo to the Persian Gulf, from

1954 to this day, for 70 years,

the false flag has remained a weapon for constructing a

narrative, for manufacturing fear, and in the

end, for justifying further illegal actions.