Debate on Akbar's Cruelty and How History Is Taught

I'd like to say that just now, sir, you said that these changes have happened.

They are spreading hatred against Muslims.

We are all taught that terrorism has no religion.

When we say that these kings committed atrocities...

Then why are you inserting religion into it? This is just history.

Where is saffronization happening in this?

Oh, Babur — this is opening old wounds.

Look, son, about Akbar — Akbar was cruel; he had 30,000 people killed.

So what is your opinion about the people who stood with Akbar?

What is your opinion about Man Singh?

What is your opinion about Todar Mal?

What is your opinion about Tansen?

What is your your opinion about Birbal?

Those who were complicit in the cruelty.

When cruelty was being inflicted on Hindus.

So what were all these people doing?

Sir, look — at that time, first of all, cruelty against mothers was happening.

And another thing, I’ve also read about Manad Seng.

I had never read until now that Akbar had also killed the Teezal people.

That wasn’t education; you always taught it as religion.