US Sanctions on International Criminal Court
Today, in a historically unprecedented move, the
United States has imposed sanctions on the International Criminal
Court as an institution.
This follows a series of designations against certain
independent judges and prosecutors serving the cause
of justice.
The Court firmly rejects these sanctions.
As an ICC judge myself, I can
assure you that the Court is not politically
motivated.
We are an independent and impartial judicial institution,
and our actions are guided only by the law and
evidence seeking to obstruct a
court of law from fulfilling its
judicial mandate is unacceptable.
It is an attack against sovereign states that have
created the Court.
It is an attack against the international legal order
more broadly.
It is an attack on the victims of mass atrocities
who have waited years, sometimes decades,
for those responsible to be held to account.
Every measure taken against the Court is
ultimately felt by those victims.
The Court was never meant to be replacement for
national justice systems. It is a court of last
resort and can only act where states are
unwilling or unable to genuinely
investigate or prosecute.
Its jurisdiction rests on a principle familiar to
every legal system in the world.
A state may bring to justice those who commit
crimes on its territory or those
crimes that are committed by its own nationals.
By joining the Rome Statute, State Parties
chose to exercise that authority together
through the Court.
Let me be clear: the ICC does not yield to
external threats that will only benefit those who
commit the most serious crimes of concern to the
international community.
Today, I reaffirm the Court's steadfast
commitment to discharging its mandate
fully with independence and
impartiality for the sake of victims.
This designation aims at disrupting the
Court's operations and intimidating those
who work for or cooperate with the Court.
The Court, for its part, will not be deterred.
Yet the Court cannot stand alone.
Its fate now rests also in the hands of the
state that create it.
The Rome Statute is a collective promise that
the most serious crimes of concern to the international
community as a whole must not go unpunished.
That promise is only as strong as the resolve of
those who made it.
There may be challenges,
but together with its State Parties, the Court has
made considerable efforts to ensure the continuity
and resilience of its activities.
The Court calls upon states to continue taking
concrete actions, including to ensure that the
Court continues to have the necessary means
to continue its work.
This is not just about defending a single institution,
but about safeguarding the international order
grounded upon the rule of law.
All of us must make a choice now
between the world where might is right
or the future based on the rule of law where
victims can continue to access justice.
In the face of such attacks, we cannot remain
indifferent.
All of us, including State Parties, have a
legal and moral duty to act in defense
of the international order.
To stand up for law, not force.
We will be judged by history for the choices
we make today.
I pledge to you the International Criminal Court
will continue its work undeterred
with a firm resolve that justice must
prevail.
Thank you.
End of transcript · 550 words