Critique of COVID Hospital Incentives

And what we did initially was a disaster.

Frankly, from a legislative perspective, what we did was we

actually incentivized murdering patients in hospitals. What we did was we

said, if you go to the hospital and you get a COVID, a positive COVID test,

then the hospital gets more money.

If you get put on remdesivir, the hospital gets more money.

If you get put on a vent, the hospital

gets more money. If you die, the hospital gets more money.

So incentivizing treating a patient to get better,

instead of saying you get more money when this patient's healthy,

we said you get more money when they die.

What incentive for a hospital

system is there to do anything different from that when the protocol's there?

The medical boards and all of these groups,

listen, frankly,

it would take me three days to go through all

the evidence that I have on corruption throughout the country on all of these guys.

We've dealt with protecting doctors from just nonsensical

attacks on their license around the country by medical boards whose

board members were practicing doctors and nurses who made

tons of money off of the existing COVID protocols.

When people like Dr. Bartlett

had protocols that worked much better, the medical boards have to be

reined in a little bit because what they did demonstrated

that their interest was more in

money than it was in protecting the lives of patients, in my opinion.