Critique of Virus Isolation Methods

Or not, and I would encourage everybody to check

me on this,

th- the isolation of every single virus,

SARS-CoV-2, smallpox, polio, measles,

Ebola,

et cetera, take unpurified material from somebody

who's sick, put it on a culture of monkey kidney

cells,

take away the nutrients, add antibiotics, add chemicals, see

if it dies. That's called the isolation of the virus,

proof that a virus exists.

And-

Wow.

And that's pure scientific nonsense.

How do you get so many

smart people, supposedly, to

agree?

So here I am, a PhD in virology.

I've got two hundred thousand dollars in student loan debt.

I have a job working, doing virology research.

And I hear this guy Cowan. He sounds kinda like a crank, you know,

but he's a medical doctor, you know, trained. He used to work in the ER.

So I'm gonna run his experiment,

which we did. Cost us twenty-five thousand bucks.

We hired a lab. We did the monkey kidney cells

exactly with or without antibiotics, with or without trypsin.

We found that the way they do the culture produces

the breakdown of the kidney cells without adding anything from

anybody who is sick.

So this guy runs the experiment, finds the same thing.

There's at least ten studies in the medical literature finding the same thing.

Goes to his supervisor, the head of the virology institute.

Says, "Look, here, I just proved this virology's nonsense."

Guy looks at the paper. He says, "Yeah, it's really good research, and by the way,

you're fired."

So how am I gonna pay for my Mercedes and my kids' college

and the bills?

There are

huge interests in keeping this

virology story alive. All the

research, all the vaccines,

all the psychological fear,

what it does is take the agency

for disease out of the person's hand.