Hegelian Dialectic: Claims About Government Control and Conflict

Georg Hegel was a German philosopher who came up with a basic

system for achieving the goals of the Illuminati called the Hegelian

dialectic.

This system is based on three steps.

In step one, a rogue government will create the problem

that harms or

even kills its own citizens. This deception is known

as a false flag attack. In step two, a rogue

government will control the reaction to the problem, which it created,

by typically blaming it on an enemy or some aspect of its own

society over which it seeks more control.

This is why the term false flag attack is so named.

In step three, a rogue government will offer the solution

to the

problem which it created. This solution is typically

a war or a system of regulations.

The solution would usually not be accepted by the public had the rogue

government not created the crisis and controlled the reaction to

it in the first place.

A government which seeks increasing control can keep pushing

society to accept its agenda by following a series of

problems, reactions, and solutions which it planned all

along.

The significance of the Hegelian dialectic is not how evil

it is, but rather how often governments choose to

follow it.

There has not been a major war in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries

that does not follow the Hegelian dialectic.

The Hegelian dialectic is a very subtle

psychological process which can destroy conviction,

crumble your conscience, and it can even eliminate

every shred of opposition that might exist within you

that would make you oppose the exterminating of Christian

principles in society. And what is so sick about

it is that it is very simple. It is a

process which involves three phases, which are

thesis,

antithesis, and synthesis. The

first phase of a Hegelian dialectic is simply

presenting the thesis. A thesis is simply the

ideologies or the beliefs of a group or of an

individual.

After this phase is completed, then phase two

begins, which is the presentation of the

antithesis. The antithesis is a

completely opposite view from the beliefs or

ideals presented in the thesis. This

is done to confuse the thoughts of the

dissenter or the target group.

Then when phase two is completed, phase three is

initiated, which is the presentation of the

synthesis. The synthesis is a

compromise between the two radically opposed

ideals or beliefs that were presented in the

thesis and the antithesis, which brings

about a completely new belief system, a

completely new belief system which is more than

readily accepted by the dissenter or the

dissenting group because it relieves the

confusion that was on their mind. And unknowingly,

now they compromise their own belief system.

This process is then repeated a number of

times until the dissenter or the

dissenters finally give up and accept

a new belief system without any more dissent

at all. And this is the process that

the cult New Age movement is using to

destroy Christian principles, Christian

values, and to initiate in our society

values that are wholly demonic and corrupt in their nature.

And we'll get into this later. The method they use is

that of the Hegelian

dialectic.

Thesis

played against antithesis leads to a synthesis.

In other words, for Hegel, for history to make progress, you

have to have conflict.

And when you look at the key people in the order, you will find that they

generate conflict. So Bush and Harriman politically are

conflicting.

Coffin and Buckley, although part of the same order,

are in public

conflicting with one another because conflict leads to the new synthesis.

The order want to accomplish in the Bolshevik Revolution.

You create opposing forces which you place in conflict.

Out of conflict, you've got profit.

You've got political power

and you can direct history. And if you look at the writings, for example,

of the

Trilateral Commission, they talk openly in the Trilateral

Commission about managing

conflict, not solving conflicts, but managing conflicts.

Managing conflicts.

Conflict management. That's the cry.

So they got the profit, the power and the management.

Mm-hmm.

Where do they want to steer history through the Bolshevik Revolution?

They wanted to set up, and they did, two opposing forces.

Out of that came World War II.