Debate on Existence of Viruses
Viruses have never been seen in nature.
They are created in laboratories.
Viruses have never been seen in nature.
They are created in laboratories.
Public belief in the virus model is the single most important factor,
keeping the whole show together.
Coming back to the title of the video,
it means that there is no evidence that viruses exist in nature.
Trying to find and isolate such particles directly from humans,
animals or plants failed long ago.
Christine Massey has tirelessly requested this evidence
from hundreds of institutions around the world
and they have all turned up a blank,
not only for SARS-CoV-2 but for any alleged viruses.
This point is crucial for people to understand.
Viruses have never been seen in nature.
They are created in laboratories,
but only as fictional constructs in the imaginations of the virologists.
This can be through calling particles in cell breakdown experiments viral
and then blaming the breakdown on the particles.
Or it could be through silly experiments where
mixtures are injected into animals and then the responses are attributed to imagined viruses.
Or it could be through creating a quote genome,
even though the provenance of the genetic material was not established.
This latter technique is increasingly favoured by virologists as
it largely takes place in the dry lab,
that is, on their computer simulations.
None of this translates to infectious, replicating and disease-causing particles
as biological entities.
Because there is no evidence that they exist,
there is no evidence that there is anything contagious to leak from a lab.
So what goes on in top-secret facilities
is nothing to do with actual viruses.
If they really had evidence for such a thing,
they would have showcased it to the public long ago.
Those who have studied the history of virology
can see that despite their best efforts,
they have a fatal problem of the missing virus.
End of transcript · 319 words