Critique of Virology Research Methods

Believe it or not, and I would encourage everybody to check me on this, the isolation of every

single virus, SARS-CoV-2, smallpox, polio, measles, Ebola, etc., take unpurified material

from somebody who's sick, put it on a culture of monkey kidney cells, take away the nutrients,

add antibiotics, add chemicals, see if it dies, that's called the isolation of the virus,

proof that a virus exists.

Wow.

And that's pure scientific nonsense.

How do you get so many smart people, supposedly, to agree?

So here I am, a PhD in virology.

I've got $200,000 in student loan debt.

I have a job, working, doing virology research.

I hear this guy, Cowan, he sounds kind of like a crank, you know, but he's a medical

doctor, you know, trained, he used to work in the ER.

So I'm going to run his experiment, which we did, cost us $25,000.

We hired a lab, we did the monkey kidney cells, exactly with or without antibiotics, with

or without trypsin, we found that the way they do the culture produces the breakdown

of the kidney cells without adding anything from anybody who is sick.

So this guy runs the experiment, finds the same thing, there's at least 10 studies in

the medical literature finding the same thing, goes to his supervisor, the head of the virology

institute, says, look, here, I just proved this virology is nonsense.

Guy looks at the paper, he says, yeah, it's really good research.

And by the way, you're fired.

So how am I going to pay for my Mercedes and my kids college and the bills?

There are huge interests in keeping this virology story alive.

All the research, all the vaccines, all the psychological fear.

What it does is take the agency for disease out of the person's head.