Civil Case Challenges COVID Vaccine Legality

A civil case that puts on record that the COVID jabs are

bioweapons. A case where jurisdiction has been

confirmed over Bill Gates,

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte,

the

State of the Netherlands and thirteen others.

Defendants who have submitted their defense and now face a substantive

hearing on the merits on the twenty-second of October in Leeuwarden.

A case where Professor Francis Boyle agreed to give

expert evidence and died just two weeks after agreeing to become an

expert witness. A case brought by seven vaccine-injured

plaintiffs,

coerced into taking the Pfizer jab, who sustained devastating injuries, two

of whom are now dead since litigation began.

A case that asserts that COVID-19 was not a disease, but a project.

COVID-19, the Great Reset. Of course, they'll censor

it. Of course, they'll suppress it on social media.

Of course, the mainstream media will remain silent.

Of course, they'll bury it in the algorithm

and throw it into a digital black hole,

so we have to break through the blackout ourselves.

This civil case was filed in July twenty twenty-three, and no, it isn't going to

end in prison sentences, but accountability has to start

somewhere. This is the first case of its kind

anywhere in

the world. And when you have a lawyer prepared to

stand

in that system and say that the COVID injection rollout

was the largest

genocide of the world's population ever, that the COVID-19

injections are a military biological weapons system, and

expose what he calls a satanic mind-bending system,

of course, they're going to want to shut it down,

and they have tried.

But despite everything, this case has kept moving,

challenge after challenge. And now the twenty-second of October

hearing is what we have been waiting for.

A five-hour substantive hearing on the merits.

The plaintiffs and their single attorney, Peter Stassen, have fought

long and hard to get this case where it is today.

And whatever happens inside that courtroom, the evidence, the experts,

and the

case will not disappear with it, because this case provides

something enormously important, a mechanism for

putting devastating evidence on the record.

If this case inspires another lawyer somewhere else in the world to grow

a spine and stand up, great. If another case can

replicate what has been done here, great.

If people can study it, learn from it, improve upon it, and take

another shot somewhere else, great.

We're not naïve, but you don't achieve anything by sitting

down and

accepting defeat. You stand up, exactly as these plaintiffs have

done, exactly as attorney Peter Stassen has

done.

This case has the potential to explode far beyond the

courtroom in the Netherlands. It's brought by the people, for the

people. And now we need you because if they won't show this

case, we bloody well will. Share this video.

Share the links. Go to thenetherlandscase.com.

Read the case file. Read the expert evidence.

Understand what is before the court and why the twenty-second of October

matters so much. Because if mainstream media refuses to cover it,

and the

algorithms refuse to show it, there's only one answer.

We become the media, and we break the blackout, and we make

damn sure the world is watching