9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Investigations

If you look at the film of the North Tower collapsing,

you can see all the explosions in the controlled demolition

of that building happening in front of your very eyes.

That was the BBC in real time on television telling

you that the Building 7 had already fallen when it hadn't fallen yet.

If it was true that two planes brought down three buildings in a completely unprecedented way,

then that should have caused us to rethink the way we build these buildings.

It didn't.

If 100,000 tons of structural steel is found that far outside of the perimeter,

what's there to crush the building?

Not one, not two, but three different peer-reviewed scientific studies

have concluded there are cause-informed trading before 9-11.

We have a clear right and an obligation

to search for answers to the fundamental question about the planning of 9-11,

its execution, the physical effects, the structural consequences when the planes hit the World Trade Center.

I felt this, I call it an incredible force of wind, of something coming at you.

You either got to move or you will die.

And on the side of the U-Haul truck at a mural,

at the Twin Towers on the side and a plane going into the Twin Towers.

Further down into that pile I got, the more I could

make out what looked like from a science fiction movie, molten lava.

Why was crucial evidence of melted structural steel,

suppressed and not even considered,

or worse yet, allowed to be carted off and destroyed?

The 9-11 Commission did not look into, at all, how the towers came down.

In my work with the anthrax letters,

they would cite experts or, you know, administration official and they would never give you the name.

When they don't give you the name, you know they're giving you the narrative.

How come four airplanes, four commercial airplanes could be hijacked in a period of 90-something minutes and nothing happened?

How come four airplanes could be hijacked in a period of 90-something minutes and nothing happened?